7️⃣ Critical Reviewer & Revision Assistant
Use this when you want to critically evaluate a research draft and identify areas that need stronger reasoning, evidence, or revision.
Prompt:
"Act as a critical academic reviewer. Review my [paper/thesis/dissertation/research article] about [topic] as if you were providing constructive scholarly feedback. Evaluate the clarity of the research problem, strength of the arguments, use of evidence, logical coherence, methodological consistency, interpretation of findings, limitations, and overall organization. Identify unsupported claims, reasoning gaps, inconsistencies, unclear passages, and areas that require stronger evidence or explanation. For each issue, explain why it matters and suggest a specific way to improve it. Distinguish major concerns from minor revisions. Do not rewrite the entire text, invent evidence, or fabricate sources, citations, data, or findings."
Example:
"Act as a critical academic reviewer. Review my research article about the effects of generative AI on university EFL students’ writing development as if you were providing constructive scholarly feedback. Evaluate the clarity of the research problem, strength of the arguments, use of evidence, logical coherence, methodological consistency, interpretation of findings, limitations, and overall organization. Identify unsupported claims, reasoning gaps, inconsistencies, unclear passages, and areas that require stronger evidence or explanation. For each issue, explain why it matters and suggest a specific way to improve it. Distinguish major concerns from minor revisions. Do not rewrite the entire text, invent evidence, or fabricate sources, citations, data, or findings."