He is the one.

🚨 ELON MUSK JUST STOOD NEXT TO TRUMP AND PROMISED EVERYONE ON EARTH A HIGH INCOME. Not universal BASIC income. Universal HIGH income. His exact words at the White House: "By FAR the most likely outcome is an AGE OF ABUNDANCE where we don't have just universal basic income, we have universal HIGH income." Then he went further: "When you have robots and you have superintelligence, it means that EVERYONE in the world can have better medical care than anyone here, including ME." Read that again. Better healthcare than the RICHEST MAN ON EARTH. For everyone. → AI does the work → Robots build everything → Money stops being the limit → Medicine for all, at a level only billionaires get today Everyone is scared AI will take their job. Elon says it's about to make them RICH. Dream or disaster? One word. Follow now. The future is moving faster than the news.

Someone spent $7,805 to accumulate 10,000 Bitcoin at $0.78. This year, he dumped it all for $1.09 billion at $109,246. That’s an insane return.

What $TRX would be worth at a fair revenue multiple $TRX is ranked 2nd most undervalued digital asset This is why $TRX will keep grinding up slowly More info here 👇 chainfees.fyi/chain/tron/

🔷 What Actually Happened: NineIron, Railgun, and the pDAI Dump Story: A PulseChain argument usually dies in the gap between a screenshot and a conclusion. This one is a good example. Cryptosolv posted Cielo alerts, then a Railgun token page, then a claim that `@NineIronCapital` had doxxed himself years ago by paying 1 million pDAI in a meme contest. The replies treated those three things as one fact: NineIron dumped, the privacy stack is his, the peg is finished. That is not what the chain shows. The chain shows a smaller, sharper story. A public account broadcast a pDAI transaction from a specific wallet. That wallet later appears as the dominant-sized depositor of bridged pDAI into Ethereum Railgun. Someone using that cluster sold pDAI on PulseChain, took ETH across a bridge, and a large unique Railgun position in the Ethereum wrapper was partially unshielded. The dollar prints were fake. The identity link is real but incomplete. The peg thesis was not settled by any of it. 1⃣. The first screenshot was a pricing illusion: The original Cielo alerts showed a wallet tagged `#nineironcapitalnew1` doing ordinary things on PulseChain: selling pDAI for WETH, then sending ETH toward a bridge. The bot printed those sales as if pDAI were $1. That is how you get captions like “$10.6M” and “$26.85M.” pDAI was not $1. It was about $0.002. At that price: 🔹 10 million pDAI is about $20,000 🔹 26.85 million pDAI is about $54,000 🔹 The later bridge-out of ~28.55 WETH is the only print that was already in a real asset Those sizes can matter on a thin PulseX book. They are not a $37 million liquidation, and they are not proof that a $1 peg just failed. Cielo was marking a forked token at Maker DAI’s unit of account. Once you strip that error, the first post becomes: a tagged wallet sold a visible chunk of pDAI and left with ether. That is still news. It is not the news people thought they were looking at. 2⃣. A Cielo tag is not ownership: `#nineironcapitalnew1` is a watchlist label. Cielo does not require a signed message from `@NineIronCapital`. Anyone tracking a wallet can name it after an X handle they believe it belongs to. The handle’s bio lists the pDAI token contract, not a personal EOA. NineIron’s public work is mostly analysis of other people’s wallets: 5996, 9E6F, B22F, FD34, the pioneer cluster. He presents as an investigator of the peg machinery, not as someone publishing “this is my treasury.” So the first attribution (tag equals person) was gossip with a hashtag. It can be right. It is not proof. 3⃣. The second screenshot was a different token on a different chain: The Railgun image looked like more of the same pDAI story. It was not. The contract is: `0x12D9FE4c9494dC363c6290bFdbb2bd9ED6358C13` That token is named “Dai Stablecoin from PulseChain.” It is what you hold on Ethereum after you send pDAI across the official PulseChain bridge. It is not Maker DAI (`0x6B175474...1d0F`). Etherscan flags it for impersonating a famous ticker because it reused `DAI`. The warning is a naming collision. The page was filtered to Ethereum’s Railgun Relay: `0xFA7093CDD9EE6932B4eb2c9e1cde7CE00B1FA4b9` Approximate inventory: 🔹 wrapper supply: ~226.4 million 🔹 still sitting in the Relay: ~189 million 🔹 holders of the wrapper: hundreds, not a crowd 🔹 explorer USD value: $0.00, because this is not $1 DAI 🔹 thin ETH DEX price: roughly the same $0.002 neighborhood as PulseChain pDAI So 189 million “DAI” in Railgun is a few hundred thousand dollars, not $189 million. The anonymity set for this token is tiny. That is the actual forensic point. 4⃣. Why the Railgun set is fingerprintable: Railgun privacy works when many unrelated users deposit overlapping sizes. This wrapper set does the opposite. Old shields, about 490–492 days before the screenshot: 🔹 `24,862,687.50` three times, from three public addresses 🔹 one `226.42M` shield from `0xF054b8e6...29525ecf8` 🔹 smaller earlier deposits from the same neighborhood of wallets Recent unshields, about 26 days before the screenshot: 🔹 three nearly identical batches 🔹 each sends ~92,481 to Railgun Treasury (fee) 🔹 each sends ~36.90 million to a different recipient That is about 110.7 million tokens leaving the private pool in clone-sized chunks, with ~189 million still inside. Three wallets depositing the exact same 24.86 million is not a crowd. Three wallets receiving the exact same 36.9 million is not a crowd. A 226 million unique deposit is a billboard. Cryptosolv was right that this Railgun contract does not hide a whale. He was wrong if that is taken to mean “pDAI supply just vanished” or “the dream is over because privacy failed.” Privacy failed for this wrapper. The PulseChain token contract did not change. 5⃣. The contest is real. The 1 million prize is not the public document: On 18 August 2023, someone asked NineIron to send 1 PLS to prove he was “the 900m wallet.” He declined and offered a meme contest instead: 1 million pDAI for the best picture of Richard Heart’s kingdom after the “pegenning.” He attached a PulseChain transaction as “proof of one pDAI moving.” Three days later he said the winner was about to be paid and that he was tallying likes across two posts. Then the public trail thins out. There is no later NineIron post that both names a winner and drops a `1,000,000 pDAI` transfer hash. That matters, because Cryptosolv’s later claim was specific: he had tracked “his” wallets for years after NineIron self-doxxed by paying someone 1 million pDAI. The method is valid. A public bounty paid on-chain is one of the cleanest social-to-chain links available without a signed message. The document he pointed to publicly is not that payment. It is the teaser transaction. 6⃣. The teaser transaction is the actual dox: The hash NineIron posted is: `0xb3196350726242d233d67e27cdd9bd8e0932b4d5fb3c2c27236d4259ddd3fdbe` PulseChain’s API returns: 🔹 timestamp `1692331515` - 18 August 2023, minutes before the contest tweet 🔹 sender: `0xf054b8e6b6f7d3c782721213e50671b29525ecf8` 🔹 recipient: `0xf78d64cf441b0de279b87fc88f7272f97db315b0` 🔹 token: pDAI 🔹 amount: small. He said “one pDAI.” Explorer parses vary between a tiny test send and a few thousand tokens. It is not one million. `0xf054b8e6...ecf8` is the same address that shielded 226.42 million wrapped pDAI into Ethereum Railgun. That is the spine of the whole affair: ``` @NineIronCapital posts a live pDAI send │ ▼ 0xf054b8e6…ecf8 PulseChain payer used as public proof │ ├─ small send ─► 0xf78d64cf…15b0 contest teaser │ └─ same key later, on Ethereum shields ~226.42M bridged pDAI into Railgun Relay ``` This is stronger than a Cielo tag and weaker than “I am NineIron” signed from that address. It means: The account was willing, in August 2023, to publish a transaction from a key that later parked the sized bridged-pDAI stack in Railgun. Keys get lost, sold, shared, and reused. The economical reading is still one operator. It is not a courtroom identification. The 1 million prize, if it happened, would be a second outbound from that same payer around 21 August 2023. That hop is still unpublished. Cryptosolv may have it in a private cluster graph. Readers do not. 7⃣. Separate the claims, or the story turns into sludge: There are four claims stacked on top of each other. Only some survive. ▫️ Claim A: A wallet sold pDAI on PulseChain and bridged ETH out. True, at modest dollar size. ▫️ Claim B: That wallet is `@NineIronCapital`. Previously: unproven tag. Now: plausible, because NineIron publicly used `0xf054…ecf8`, and that address is the Railgun wrapper whale. Still not a signature. ▫️ Claim C: Bridged pDAI in Ethereum Railgun is a thin, fingerprintable set, and a large unique stack was partially unshielded. True. This is Cryptosolv’s best point. ▫️ Claim D: Therefore only NineIron can withdraw a significant amount, bridge it back, dump pDAI, and kill the peg. Half true, then false. If one cluster still holds the Railgun notes for the remaining ~189 million wrapper tokens, that cluster can unshield them. Capability is not action. Unshielding on Ethereum is not a PulseChain dump. Bridging back and selling on PulseX would be. And even then the dollar overhang is hundreds of thousands, not hundreds of millions. NineIron later arguing that the man will never sign a message is an admission of the standard of proof. Cluster analysis is what it is. It is not a confession. 8⃣. What this does not do to pDAI: pDAI on PulseChain is still the forked Maker token at `0x6B175474...1d0F`. Bridging it to Ethereum mints a wrapper. It does not rewrite the PulseChain contract, reset oracles, finish flop auctions, recapitalize pMKR, or create a redemption right at $1. The peg argument (whether one takes it seriously or not) lives in a different room: collateral, bad debt, governance hats, L2 portals, whether anyone will treat the token as money. Moving wrapper inventory through Railgun does not flip those switches. It also does not prove they work. It is simply a different question. The market-cap arithmetic is the same reminder as the first screenshot. Current pDAI trades near two-tenths of a cent. A 500x to $1 is a thesis, not a spot price. Marking Railgun balances at $1 is the same error Cielo made. 110 million wrapper tokens at $0.002 is about $220,000. 189 million remaining is about $380,000–$500,000. Versus a ~$100 million floating market cap, that is a watchable overhang. Versus a $1 valuation of the whole supply, it is noise. 9⃣. What it does change for holders Your coins on PulseChain did not migrate because a screenshot dropped. If you hold pDAI in a PulseChain wallet, nothing in this episode repriced the contract. What changed is the map of supply and the quality of a popular story. 🔹Supply left the home chain. Some pDAI is no longer sitting in PulseChain wallets. It exists on Ethereum as a wrapper. A majority of that wrapper is still in Railgun. A large slice became public again on three Ethereum addresses about 26 days before Cryptosolv’s image. Those three addresses are the live objects. They can sit, sell into a tiny ETH pool, reshield, or bridge home. Only the last path is direct PulseChain sell pressure. 🔹The hidden-bull-stack story is weaker. Community chat had already floated “someone like NineIron has hundreds of millions in Railgun.” There is a large wrapper stack in Ethereum Railgun. It is also trackable. Unique sizes, repeated amounts, and a public 2023 seed transaction are enough. Do not treat shielded bridged-pDAI as invisible treasury that will appear at $1 and save the chart. 🔹Privacy here was always a thin costume. Railgun as a protocol is not broken. This token’s Railgun set is too small to hide a whale. Anyone planning to warehouse a controversial future dollar in that wrapper already left fingerprints. That is a lesson about opsec on a niche bridge asset, not a verdict on zero-knowledge systems. 🔹Narrative risk is the main hit. Peg-token communities run on belief that large aligned holders will not be the exit liquidity. A plausible reading of this flow is rotation: PulseChain pDAI to ETH, then privacy, then optionality. Another reading is an analyst who also trades, or a cluster that lost conviction. The explorer cannot tell you which. It can tell you the “nobody important is selling” line is no longer free. Do not confuse a KOL with the mechanism. Even if `0xf054…ecf8` is NineIron, NineIron is not pMKR, not the 5996 cleaner, not the official bridge, and not a central bank. One large holder leaving or hedging does not decide whether a forked stablecoin ever trades at a dollar. It decides how much social premium you should attach to that holder’s certainty. 🔟. How a holder should actually use this: Watch the chain, not the slogan. The wallets that matter now are concrete: 🔹`0xf054b8e6b6f7d3c782721213e50671b29525ecf8` on PulseChain and Ethereum 🔹 Railgun Relay `0xFA7093…A4b9` for the wrapper `0x12D9FE4c…8C13` 🔹 the three ~36.9 million unshield recipients 🔹 any new Relay out of that wrapper 🔹 any wrapper burn/mint through the PulseChain OmniBridge, which is the only path that returns supply to PulseX. If those unshielded tokens come home and hit PulseX, Cryptosolv’s warning pays in price. If they idle on Ethereum, this was inventory theater plus a successful identity tease. If they sell on the wrapper’s tiny ETH pool, PulseChain holders feel it only indirectly, through sentiment. Position sizing should assume the obvious: A token that needs a future $1 to justify the bag can also be sold at two-tenths of a cent by people who helped write the story. That was always true. It is merely harder to deny this week. 1⃣1⃣. The clean version A bot priced pDAI as if it were dollars. It is not. A label named a wallet after an X account. That is not a signature. The same X account once posted a live pDAI transaction from `0xf054…ecf8`. That address is the sized depositor of bridged pDAI into Ethereum Railgun. That is the self-dox, and it is the one part of Cryptosolv’s identity claim that a reader can re-run. The Railgun set for that wrapper is too unique to be private. A large stack went in. About a third of the visible wrapper supply came back out in three matching chunks. Most of it is still inside. None of that burns native pDAI, finishes the peg, or turns 189 million wrapper tokens into $189 million. It tells holders that some large inventory already left PulseChain, that “it’s in Railgun” is not a curtain, and that the next fact to wait for is not another theory. It is whether those public Ethereum balances bridge back and sell. That is what really happened. The rest is the culture around a cheap token that wants to be a dollar. #pDAI $1 ❤️💛🧡💚💙🩵💜🩷🤍❤️

What a thrilling and passionate battle between these two Chinese stars 😳 The scores and mental states were just up and down so many times. It literally came down to the very last round of the final game to decide the winner.

Mikaela Lafuente The most viral video of the week

🔥9/11: Wings Cut Through Steel Like Butter After 25 years, it’s starting to get a little boring to have the same old discussion over and over again, but so you can see everything at a glance: Here, for comparison, you can see that nothing on the aluminum plane breaks off, explodes, or even bends—because it’s just cheap computer graphics (CGI). With today’s AI, it would look more professional. And before you join the discussion here, please watch all the videos below. There you’ll also see footage of the nose coming out the other side.

PulseChain will be to Ethereum what the iPhone was to BlackBerry 👊🏻