Yup, but it can quickly become a slippery slope.
@mynameisceline on the difference between instrumental writing, which gets something done, and metamorphic writing, which transforms the person doing it:
“I increasingly feel that to do really great work, you want the metamorphic qualities to come in. You want to be shaped or disciplined by the work you’re trying to do."
“To achieve a certain quality of work, you understand that you have to grow as a person. You need to be more patient, more thoughtful, more willing to iterate, more ambitious.”
This is the thing people don’t understand about non-fiction writing:
Aside from memoirs & New York Times level research, 99% of non-fiction’s value is purely information.
You do not read for enjoyment of sentence structure, voice, style, metaphor, etc.
You read for answers to questions.
I have heard Hormozi say the words in this email 10 different times in 10 marginally different ways. The value is always the same.
(Question) How do you grow your business?
(Answer) One way is call leads faster.
Whether Alex wrote it, or AI “wrote it” is irrelevant. The value didn’t change.
And it’s this type of writing that is going to be one of the biggest categories to get “automated” by people who have already done the thinking, and crystallized their thinking into things they’ve already written/said.
AI is just helping repeat the information faster.