important and troubling counterpoint to the view that AI will rapidly accelerate science - some practitioners are seeing or fear a world in which the flood of outputs means "neither individual understanding nor our collective epistemic projects make *any* progress at all."
This is precisely right. As a track chair at Neurips, I am seeing cases where the papers were written by LLMs, reports likewise, rebuttals too, even in some cases Area Chairs joining the flood. It becomes a potemkin village where nobody is actually accountable for anything that they are saying, and neither individual understanding nor our collective epistemic projects make *any* progress at all.