I'm a content creator providing an Integral perspective on current events. Youtube Channel: piped.video/@IntegralViews

Integral Views retweeted
“We can start having slave girls again.” – Muslim community leader in the UK. A local Muslim preacher told his community about the importance of enslaving non-Muslim girls to stop Muslim fathers from raping their own baby daughters when mothers are unavailable to change diapers. Islam is incompatible with the 21st century! Sharia blasphemy law has no place in the civilized world!
Liza Rosen
John Cleese is not the threat to Britain. The people who reported him to Prevent are. They called him an Islamophobic hate preacher. His offence? Preferring a culture that does not approve of FGM, child marriage, and killing infidels. Prevent was built for terrorists. They filed it on a comedian. I have criticised him myself. He treated Israel as an enemy and wants Britain set against Israeli interests, because “Britain first” apparently means offence whenever British and Israeli interests align. If you stand with Israel, criticise him. Do not silence him. We answer in the open. We do not protect speech only when it flatters us. He handed us the reply. Use it. Let the bias against Israel sit where it cannot be defended. We do not need John Cleese’s approval to exist. We will defend ourselves anyway. We will never be a threat to his freedom. Britain must stop persecuting its own people to appease hostile jihadists.
776
7,435
13,003
359,662

ALT Mitchell And Webb Are We The Baddies GIF by Giphy QA

1
38
Integral Views retweeted
Replying to @carla_denyer
The Green Party are a collection of delusional mid-wit utopian fantasists, Islamists and young people who have had their brains scrambled by short form social media content.
1
1
15
361
Integral Views retweeted
EXCLUSIVE: Tan Ikram, deputy chief magistrate, is an adviser to a Pakistani organisation that referred to “so-called ‘grooming gangs’” and called Suella Braverman’s comments about British-Pakistani gangs “reprehensible”. My investigation reveals: • He targeted Bradford to encourage Pakistani lawyers to become judges: “[Bradford has] lots and lots of Pakistani practitioners… I specifically went there to reach out to that particular group of lawyers.” • He is listed as an adviser to the British Pakistan Foundation, which attacked Braverman over her grooming-gang comments and condemned the “collective punishment of the Palestinians” following October 7. Ikram spared three women punishment for a terrorism offence involving paraglider images. • Grooming gang survivor Fiona Goddard called his association with the foundation “deeply concerning”, asking: “Why is a senior judge connected to such a partisan group?” • He helped organise a meeting between judges and senior imams at the Old Bailey. • He sits on the Judicial Appointments Commission and has helped edit the guidance judges use on race and cultural differences. • He said he used his ethnicity as “a bit of an advantage” in his legal career. He also said his mother “today doesn’t really speak English”, despite coming to Britain in the early 1960s. I’ve examined his speeches, interviews, links to Pakistani and Muslim groups and rulings. Read the full investigation: stevenedginton.com/p/we-need…
411
3,334
9,536
826,203
I'm furious about @andyburnham saying that Britain will develop a 'Global Code' and lead the world in AI. That is the exact opposite of the truth. On the same day he said that, OpenAI held their DevDay and launched an important new product called 'Dots'. Dots are rolling out to almost every country in the World apart from the EU, EEA, UK and Switzerland. This follows Meta choosing not to launch their latest agentic AI assistant in these regions as well. Why? Neither company has said this but it's highly likely due to GDPR regulations which would make these persistent cloud based agentic AI assistants very risky for the AI companies. I cannot stress what a major disadvantage this is for British and EU citizens. These agents are cloud based, always on personal assistants that can book appointments, stay on the phone to get those rare GP appointments, renegotiate your bills, etc. They can project manage and aid entrepreneurs hugely. At such an important time, when these technologies are moving fast and redefining industries on a daily basis, to be shut out of the best technology puts us all at a competitive disadvantage. This is the equivalent of regions banning electricity when it was first invented. We will not recover from this. Nothing demonstrates our decline better than this. To then have our leaders standing on stage and saying we're going to lead the world with a straight face articulates their utter incompetence and irrelevance. On the same day, President Trump stood next to the CEOs of X, Meta, Google, Anthropic and others and said they'd been in talks with Xi in China. Britain and the EU are an irrelevance and we're on track to be ever more so.
🚨 WATCH: Andy Burnham says he will create a "global code" for AI so Britain can "capture the benefits" "We led the world's first industrial revolution from the Midlands and the North of England. So why can't we lead the next one? We can, and we will"
3
3
8
394
Maybe setting up a political system where the most incompetent people who cannot succeed in the private sector end up running the country was a bad idea.
1
1
55
508
If Labour do not go into freefall in the polls after this conference then I'll have to conclude that Britain deserves everything coming to it.
7
351
Integral Views retweeted
When most people hear the word “fairness”, they automatically think of the social contract or intergenerational justice. But when a Labour MP talks about “fairness”, they mean giving third-world immigrants the same rights, status and resources as native Brits.
Fairness is what unites us in this country. And a fair society is what unlocks the very best of us. Because when people think this country is fair they are more open and generous to others.
15
66
435
7,786
When one side of the political divide makes their position the destruction of the nation based to a large extent on the vote base of migrants or the children of migrants, normal politics ceases to apply. Historically, politics has been about disagreements on how best to serve the nation, it's people and its historical culture. What is happening now is a debate about the very existence of the nation and culture. That's a completely different philosophical arena that's not focused on nearly enough. The leftist position is the one that's extreme. What we're actually debating and voting on the basis of is the very existence of the nation, culture and people as a defined entity. These are the debates that should be happening openly. Force the left into that arena. Force them to discard their sheep's clothing and be honest with voters. Unless the right has forced those on the left to openly argue for Britain to not be prioritized and to be replaced by a globalist system, then they have failed. They must be forced to argue for non-British cultures being prioritized because that's what their policies deliver. The left believes that the cultural in group of British people is harmful. It believes that no preferential treatment of Britain should be allowed and the opposite is the greatest moral virtue. Force them to wear this endlessly. To say that the left now represents an existential threat to Britain is not hyperbole or pure exaggeration. Every policy that the left now represents is anti-British but they too often get away with clothing their policies within an illusion of being in Britain's best interests. A summary of the leftist position is 'It's in the best interests of Britain for Britain to no longer exist'.
4
7
344
This is actually worse than the alternative.
🚨BREAKING: Counter Terror Police say the five men arrested near RAF Fairford are British nationals from London
1
2
179
The issues we have a deeply baked in.
1
53
Today is one of those days where I feel Britain is lost and there's simply no hope. One of those days where I day dream about leaving the country and get lost in thought about where I could possibly escape to. We've seen the bodyguard of the leader of Hamas bought into the country by our government, given asylum and then granted citizenship. We wake up to a foiled terror plot on a US military site on British soil days after our foreign secretary was shaking hands with Iran’s foreign minister. This is constant and it's still only the beginning due to what's already baked in. The system is producing twisted realities endlessly. How does our Home Secretary respond to these developments? She announced more refugee routes for women from Afghanistan and Gaza which will be open to abuse and will no doubt involve bringing in endless family members. Fast tracked to permanent settlement no less. WHY?! They are simply dead set on importing as many people from the exact locations that should be red listed as possible. I detest them all. They subject us to tortuous two tier justice that has simply become the norm. All examples of injustice are ignored. All evidence of the consequences of their decisions is ignore and buried. We witness sexism and racism overtly expressed by the left on mainstream national TV and no one even notices anymore. They are gearing up for yet more information control to shut down speech. I look at the voting intentions of our youth and despair. Their brains have been scrambled by a combination of ideological, naive teachers and TikTok. I look at the right of politics and see endless childish squabbling and a lack of seriousness. The trajectory I see for Britain is extremely dark. Our economy is failing in real time. Our politicians live in a dream world. I will not live in such a country. 2029 is the last chance.
81
141
938
20,065
'Go and die in a war you mongrels' Jacob Rees Mogg's position.
1
2
14
318
Integral Views retweeted
Replying to @larisamlbrown
Swearing and 'being feral' is actually just normal male behavior in groups, including friendships. All workplaces used to be like this. Women find this atmosphere to be threatening and have gone about changing every working environment to suit their preferences without a single thought that men might find those new female coded, HR dominated safe space environments uncomfortable. We do, by the way. We hate them. Men retreated into gaming and now that's also been infiltrated by woke game developers. Masculinity is simply no longer acceptable. I'm sick of what women prefer being the unchallenged yardstick for what's apparently morally virtuous.
41
122
3,455
61,480
They Weakened Britain. Now They Expect You to Fight For It. After deconstructing Britain piece by piece, our leaders now demand that we fight to protect the nation that they have refused to even define, let alone fight for. Full video on my channel.
2
288
good time to plug my favourite recent yougov study which found there's functionally NO difference between the left-right partisanship of straight men and straight women, and that the gender gap is almost entirely powered by the differential between lgbt women and lgbt men 💀
Women being generally more progressive than men but then hating bisexual men for some reason is quite bizarre
68
485
8,327
539,739
I think that the mounting global conflict is a great opportunity for all the girl bosses and LGBTQ folk to demonstrate their immense power. Go out there and defend the system you've built. Let us know when the battles are won. You got this.
1
8
189
I think that a better name for AI is 'synthetic intelligence' rather than artificial intelligence.
4
213
After spending decades preferentially treating everyone and everything that is not British. After inviting in hundreds of thousands of unknown men from Africa and the Middle East and forcing us to pay for it. After putting them up in hotels instead of our own homeless veterans. After covering up their extreme rates of crime. Going to court to prevent the data being released to citizens. After enabling a civilizational crime against the most vulnerable people in Britain at the hands of mostly Pakistani 1st and 2nd generation migrants and then covering it up. After overseeing our demographic replacement in all of our major cities and then forcing us to pay for social housing for much the new population in places that we cannot afford to live. After saying 'Britain is built for all' (Kier Starmer) and importing millions upon millions of people against the will of citizens. After labelling anyone that complains a 'racist' or 'fascist' and demonizing any form of nationalism. After clearly demonstrating that our own government will not fight for British people but actively works against them, thinking it to be a moral virtue. After demonizing the very essence of what it means to be British and then devaluing it by handing out citizenship like confetti to people who have taken jobs off British people. After working to hand away our military assets to foreign powers and degrade anything that is culturally British. After not training our own young people and instead importing their replacement. They now expect us to fight for the very system that has been enacting this abusive relationship upon us. Why would we do that? Why would I fight to prop up a system that does everything possible to insult, degrade, ignore and demonize me simply for demanding the prioritization of Britain and British people whilst watching it be destroyed by our political establishment? I will not fight for any government or system that does not fight for me. I suggest the British government asks the new arrivals to fight instead. They are the ones who have a vested interest in this new system after all.
War may be coming. Are we psychologically ready? bbc.in/4yHhKUD
55
322
2,379
204,839