This aged well.
You could’ve bought a DGX Spark for $3500-4000, and Codex's $200 plan was actually pretty generous.
3 month later we have a 64 GB DGX Spark retailing for $4950, the 128 GB retailing for $6950, and a new $500 Codex plan.
How will it look like in 1 year from now?
"It just doesn’t math."
I keep seeing this take. But why run AI on your own hardware?
Because for many of us, the cloud just doesn’t math either. Personally, I replaced all my Claude + Codex usage with DeepSeek-v4-Flash running locally on two DGX Sparks.
For reference: $8,000 spent on the Claude Sonnet API would currently buy you roughly 800 million output tokens — about 5 months of continuous generation at 60 tokens/sec.
The "It just doesn't math" claim: "For $8000 + electricity you could get over 4 years of Claude Max $200/mo sub plans, which would give you more Sonnet usage than your local setup."
Who says Claude Max stays at $200/mo? They’re literally losing money on every sub right now — this price won’t last. They also nerf the limits constantly, & you’re STILL rate-limited even on the top tier.
I know you can’t run actual Sonnet locally. That’s not the point.
The point is: for my workflows, the local models I can run are good enough to fully replace it. A lot of people (including me) simply prefer not to send work through certain cloud providers, whether for privacy, trust, or other reasons.
So the real question is: if the hardware can replace what you’re already paying for in API costs, is $8k justifiable? For me, it absolutely is.
Plus… you actually own it.
You don’t like owning things?
Oct 3, 2026 · 11:14 AM UTC
32
21
230
36,031






























