The Goated Discussion started x.lingyaoai.com/i/spaces/1vJpPNOjmjQJE

That’s fine though. Traditional companies pay for marketing, that’s not a controversial business practice

Not always, depends on the subnet. Nous definitely used to publish miner models to public Hugging Face repositories, whilst some subnets just have miners share trained model weights. Really depends

Business is more than just tech. If they’re better at marketing and building excitement that’s a valid enough progression

I don’t really see the issue with this…? Lots of amazing projects are forks of other projects - we all build on the shoulders of others. Build, iterate, improve. That’s the whole point of having infrastructure and code in the public domain. Look at Bittensor ffs, the miners get better and better because for many subnets they see the models of the previous winners and iterate on these. This is how you get to State of the Art tech.

We're open-source builders too. Soon we'll ship our own projects on the basepad GitHub, MIT licensed. We all know what that means: take it, use it, make it better. That's exactly what we did, and it's been on our site since day one. Not a discovery. Base is finally moving again. Builders fighting each other only slows Base down. We're all on the same ship. We're busy building. 🔵

Crypto has always been a shitshow but it’s gotten worse with AI, for sure

robinhood:0xc4f730335fb9e439ca5552f7b52b8e638c4245b0 is potential a 9+ fig coin trading at 5m cap. This is one of the few projects on @RobinhoodCrypto that's actually innovating & aligns with @vladtenev values. They already had 3k+ people use the protocol in testnet, 100k+ deposits and $83M robinhood:0x5fc5360d0400a0fd4f2af552add042d716f1d168 value tracked. Early AF.

Looks like this was a scam too. The space is incredibly tough to navigate at the moment, we really need to focus on backing doxxed teams, or at least those with track records. AI has made it so much easier for extractive teams to build a professional looking product, website, etc, but thankfully it has also made it much easier for us as investors and traders to be able to look through the onchain labyrinth and work out what is actually happening behind the scenes. I think we have to assume 99.99% of launches are rugs, and therefore just plan to not invest in anything until it’s been established for some time, built some chart history, etc. Obviously you miss some early stage opportunities in doing so - but if almost everything is a scam it is not even worth trying to catch the one or two that aren’t, until they have proven themselves a little more. I would much, much rather invest in an inferior product with a known and trusted team than an amazing idea that gets abandoned within hours (or was always intended to be a scam). Even average products should run to 8+ figures when the bull run is in full swing, especially if the team have been working and the community have been pushing whatever the chart has been doing. Better still if they have been doing so while the chart has been in the doldrums for weeks or months. Everyone needs to stop expecting shit to pump 1000x overnight, if you’re building a product you should treat it like a business and expect that it will take months or longer before you are taking anything out of the project - if devs actually lock in and focus on building something good, and taking time, they’ll be much much further ahead (to the tune of millions…) vs producing scam after scam and extracting a few grand each time. It’s so short sighted, it doesn’t make any sense even for a dishonest operator. Do better.

This looks interesting, guys. Good idea @mintfolio_ team. Let's see how the tech works, but looks interesting for sure.

Seriously wtf is this nonsense?

$BAGFI can pull an $AF typa run, and i won't be surprised. Also over $150M+ USDC borrowed against cirBTC on @arc using Morpho signaling a rising interest in Lending/Borrowing platforms. The first Arc-centric lending/borrowing platform is bagfifun, and it allows user borrow USDC against their arc memecoins. Don't you see that $BAGFI is cheap and undervalued? Projects/Teams on Arc that will need USDC to keep building and scaling their products can now even lend some of their memecoin supply to get USDC for product improvements, while still having their supply intact. Can't you see this is undervalued?

Window to accumulate sub $1M mcap robinhood:0xeb24a2663af4ee979dcbfe39cb95b5f12d369c4b is closing Chads have been accumulating on these dips Expecting a run back to $5M+ real soon RUN IT BACK

No risk. No Ferrari Nobody got rich without having the balls to bid big at the bottoms Get the discounts on the bags which have survived this shitshow, while they’re still cheap Bullposting and Bagworking

Yeah we're through it now - just need to get out of the FVG and through the pivot, etc.

And we've broken out, which is nice

Agreed! $30m target feels good

Looks like it, but you haven't included the CA

$UBI CA: 0xfa3ffdf775cc3f6ac82cd258fb948a8a21e1749e Disclosure: I hold a position (and I really like this asset) Wave 1 peaked at $979.8k, and I believe Wave 2 may have terminated at the 78.6% retracement level of Wave 1, at $311.2k, in the upper half of the 1H Demand Structure highlighted blue. We have broken out above the Wave b swing high of $715.5k, and indeed have also broken out above the Wave 1 swing high, where we found resistance at the Weekly R3 + Daily R1 confluence area. We have declined to the top of the blue highlighted area, where we are looking to find support. We are also attempting to hold the Daily Pivot as support. If the current count is correct, Wave 3 should target a minimum of $1.6m, before a Wave 4 pullback to around $1.1m and then a Wave 5 push up to around $2m. Breaking down below the Wave 2 low of $311.2k would invalidate the count.

solana:HgcxVs6kJhPAaGqnPNGaa7zYgNT49hJrLufiqcNMuYZT (Update) CA: HgcxVs6kJhPAaGqnPNGaa7zYgNT49hJrLufiqcNMuYZT Disclosure: I have added to my position since the previous post. Further decline took us past the green Fair Value Gap and as mentioned in the previous update we would then have been targeting the upper half of the Demand Wick highlighted red. We found some support there but were then rejected at the descending resistance line. Price has declined further into the red Demand Wick, where we look to be finding some support past the 90% retracement level of Wave 1. We are currently trying to break back out of this area, as well as trying to push through the Daily R1 and the Point of Control, so it would not be surprising to find some resistance in this area. If we clear this confluence of resistances, we will then need to clear the descending resistance line, followed by the Weekly Pivot. Breaking out and holding above these levels would be a good sign that the low is in, and breaking out above the swing high at $9m would add confidence to the count. If the current count is correct, Wave 3 should target a minimum of $25.8m, before a Wave 4 pullback to around $16.4m and then a Wave 5 push upto around $31.7m.