One of $BTC's deepest ideas is incentive compatibility:
Design the system so self-interest produces the outcome the system needs.
That is Bitcoin.
Miners want profit โ they secure the network.
Node operators want valid Bitcoin โ they reject invalid blocks.
Holders want scarcity โ they resist dilution.
Hurwicz, Maskin and Myerson won the 2007 Nobel Prize in Economics for foundational work in mechanism design.
Bitcoin launched in 2009.
There is no evidence Satoshi directly borrowed from their work.
But he built the principle into money.
Bitcoin does not require people to be good.
It makes protecting the system economically rational.
current frontier models still blow me away after more than a decade of writing code.
code is the medium between language and binary. now you can just speak in english (or any language) and get the llm to write the machine code (binary + abstracted).
(hopefully) in the not distance future you can say build me a house and you'll have machines moving matter around in the real world to make this happen.
Funny how manisphere telling guys they need to be a 6ft millionaire
and boss babes telling girls they should only settle for a 6ft millionaire
lol. The only winner is the algorithm
15 years ago, if you did the responsible thing & bought $10,000 of 'risk-free' long-term Treasuries, you'd have $11,072 today.
If instead you spent $9,995 on drugs & $5 on bitcoin, you'd have $42,778 today.
Just realised what idiot thought it would be a good idea to use CHESS MATCHMAKING for dating apps.
I couldn't care less but from an engineering and data analysis stand point it doesn't make sense.
If a super modal suddenly slides in your DMs, and starts flirting back and forth and then asks for your telegram.
That not a super modal. That's KGB spetsnaz intelligence division
current frontier models still blow me away after more than a decade of writing code.
code is the medium between language and binary. now you can just speak in english (or any language) and get the llm to write the machine code (binary + abstracted).
(hopefully) in the not distance future you can say build me a house and you'll have machines moving matter around in the real world to make this happen.