We all know that AI is a highly divisive issue. A working group convened at the Simons Institute earlier this month, to formulate concrete action items for TCS academia to take in response to AI. Remarkably, despite the wide range of opinions, participants were able to arrive at broad consensus on the list of recommendations here:
simons.berkeley.edu/AITCSrep…. Many apply more broadly to mathematics, and beyond.
This document is NOT a declaration or essay. It is a list of concrete proposals, fleshed out all the way from motivation to implementation. Its purpose is to provide a common reference point and shared baseline for the community to discuss and enact change.
The actions are intentionally designated to be taken in the short term (specifically, this academic year); they are not meant to represent a stable vision of the future. You do not have to like them; you just have to like them MORE than what will happen if nobody takes action. Not everybody at the workshop agreed with every action, but they ultimately came together through discussion and compromise.
For transparency, I was involved in this event in a purely organizational capacity. I did not come up with any of these actions, but I recognize their importance and I will support them however I can. I hope you do too.
In September, we hosted a working group to think about how the TCS community should respond to AI progress. Their report, released yesterday, highlights 12 near-term actions that received broad support among the participants.
simons.berkeley.edu/news-pub…