Hyperliquid: The Decentralized Nasdaq Financial infrastructure is evolving. While Nasdaq pioneered electronic trading and orderbook technology, Hyperliquid takes the next step: a neutral, permissionless protocol layer where anyone can build, list, and trade. Same efficiency, different architecture. Think of it as the TCP/IP of finance—infrastructure so fundamental that everything else gets built on top. What is Nasdaq? Before we talk about why Hyperliquid is better, let's understand what Nasdaq actually does: Nasdaq is a platform that provides: • Spot market for stocks (buy and own shares of companies) • Infrastructure for trading (orderbooks, matching engine, clearing) • Listing process for companies (IPOs, standards, compliance) • Derivatives market via partners (futures, options through CME) The limitation? Everything lives under one roof. The protocol, the listing, the access, the frontend, the compliance, all controlled by a single entity. This creates: • Single point of failure • Easy censorship (governments can force delistings) • Centralized control (regulatory pressure can force delistings) • No competition on UX (one interface for all users) • Bundled pricing (can't separate infrastructure costs from compliance costs) Enter Hyperliquid: The Modular Financial Stack Hyperliquid takes a radically different approach by separating the protocol layer from the application layer. The Protocol Layer (Permissionless Infrastructure) HYPERLIQUID L1 (HyperCore) • Native orderbooks (200k orders/sec) • Matching engine (on-chain) • Margin system (cross + isolated) • Liquidation engine • 0.2s median latency Permissionless • Neutral • 24/7 What lives on the protocol: • HIP-1: Spot tokens (like stocks, but tokenized) • Native perps: BTC-USD, ETH-USD, SOL-USD, etc. • HIP-3: Builder-deployed perps (anyone can list derivatives) What doesn't: • KYC/AML enforcement • Token filtering or censorship • Frontend interface • User onboarding The Application Layer (Competitive Frontends) Frontends compete on: • User experience (UX/UI) • Fee structure (builder codes) • Compliance level (KYC vs no-KYC) • Target audience (institutions vs retail vs niche communities) • Features (AI trading assistants, social trading, gamification) Why This Changes Everything 1. True Permissionlessness Nasdaq: Need approval from Nasdaq Inc. to list. Expensive ($50k-$500k+ in fees), slow (months), and requires meeting strict standards. Hyperliquid: Anyone can list via Dutch auction. • HIP-1 tokens: 500 HYPE auction every 31 hours • HIP-3 perps: First 3 assets free, then 500 HYPE auction • No gatekeepers, no approval process, no lobbying needed Example: Want to create a spot for your niche community token? Just win the auction and deploy. Done. 2. Censorship Resistance Nasdaq: Can delist assets based on regulatory pressure, compliance issues, or internal decisions. Once delisted, trading stops entirely. Hyperliquid: Once deployed, tokens and perps stay on-chain forever. The protocol is neutral—it doesn't care what you list or who you are. Important distinction: Frontends can choose to hide certain tokens from their interface, but the tokens remain tradeable on-chain. This is like how Gmail can filter emails, but the email protocol (SMTP) doesn't censor content. 3. Separation of Compliance and Infrastructure This is the genius move that makes Hyperliquid scale to billions of users. Traditional model (Nasdaq): • Protocol + Compliance = One package • Everyone must KYC → High friction → Excludes billions Hyperliquid model: Protocol (neutral) ≠ Compliance (optional at frontend level) Frontend A: Strict KYC → Institutional users Frontend B: No KYC → DeFi natives Frontend C: Light KYC → Retail users Same infrastructure, different compliance levels Why this matters: • Institutions can use compliant frontends (satisfies regulators) • DeFi natives can use permissionless frontends (preserves decentralization) • Everyone trades on the same liquidity pool (network effects) 4. 24/7 Global Markets Nasdaq: • Trading hours: 9:30 AM - 4:00 PM EST • Monday-Friday only • Closed on holidays • Extended hours available but with low liquidity Hyperliquid: • 24/7/365 • No holidays • No "market closed" (even for TradFi assets like XYZ100) • Same liquidity at 3 AM as at 3 PM Innovation: XYZ Perps XYZ100 (Nasdaq-100 index perp) trades 24/7 even when US equity markets are closed. How? Internal pricing mechanism: • When external markets are open: Uses Pyth oracle (CME futures data) • When external markets are closed: Uses 8-hour EMA of mark price + orderbook impact price • Smooth transition when markets reopen This is revolutionary. You can trade exposure to Apple, Microsoft, Tesla at 2 AM on a Sunday. No other platform offers this. 5. Builder Ecosystem via Builder Codes Nasdaq: Limited or no revenue share with third-party interfaces. If you build a trading app that routes orders, you typically make money from subscriptions or payment-for-order-flow, not direct fee sharing from the exchange Hyperliquid: Builder codes let frontends earn a percentage of trading fees. How it works: // User trades 100,000 USDC notional // Base fee: 0.045% = $45 // Builder code: 0.02% = $20 to frontend // Net user fee: 0.065% // Frontend earns revenue directly from facilitating trades This creates a flywheel: 1. Better frontends attract more users 2. More users = more volume = more revenue for frontend 3. More revenue = more resources to improve UX 4. Better UX = more users (repeat) Result: Explosion of innovation at the application layer. We'll see hundreds of specialized frontends, each optimizing for different use cases. 6. Complete Market Stack Hyperliquid isn't just spot or just derivatives—it's everything. Nasdaq ecosystem: • Nasdaq: Spot stocks • CME: Futures and options (separate entity) • CBOE: More options (another separate entity) 7. Performance That Matches (or Beats) CEXs Hyperliquid benchmarks: • Throughput: 200k orders/second (current), millions planned • Latency: 0.2s median, 0.9s p99 (comparable to major CEXs) • Finality: 1 block (<1 second) • Uptime: 99.9%+ All of this, fully on-chain. No off-chain orderbooks, no trusted intermediaries, no shortcuts. 8. Composability with DeFi Nasdaq: Walled garden. If you want to build something that uses Nasdaq data or infrastructure, you need expensive licenses and permissions. Hyperliquid: Open protocol. HyperEVM lets you build anything: Examples: • Lending protocols that use Hyperliquid spot prices for liquidations • Automated trading vaults that rebalance based on funding rates • Prediction markets that settle against Hyperliquid perp prices • Social trading platforms where you copy top traders All permissionless. No approval needed. Real-World Example: XYZ Perps XYZ is the first HIP-3 deployment, and it's already proving the model works. XYZ100 (Nasdaq-100 Index Perp): • Tracks the top 100 non-financial companies on Nasdaq (AAPL, MSFT, NVDA, TSLA, etc.) • Uses Pyth oracle for CME futures prices • Converts futures to spot using cost-of-carry model • 24/7 trading even when US equity markets are closed • Isolated margin only (for now) Why this matters: • First decentralized way to get 24/7 exposure to US equities • Proof that TradFi assets can trade on-chain with robust pricing • Opens the door to thousands more TradFi perps (individual stocks, commodities, forex, indices) What's next for XYZ: • Individual stock perps (AAPL-USD, TSLA-USD, NVDA-USD) • More indices (S&P 500, Dow Jones, Russell 2000) • International equities (Nikkei, DAX, FTSE) • Commodities (gold, oil, natural gas) Why Hyperliquid Wins: The TCP/IP Analogy What TCP/IP did for the internet: • Created a neutral protocol layer (anyone can send packets) • Enabled permissionless innovation (anyone can build apps) • Separated infrastructure from applications (Gmail vs SMTP) • Made the internet censorship-resistant What Hyperliquid does for finance: • Creates a neutral protocol layer (anyone can list and trade) • Enables permissionless innovation (anyone can build frontends) • Separates infrastructure from compliance (protocol vs frontends) • Makes finance censorship-resistant The Trilemma Solution Traditional systems can't achieve all three: Permissionless ▲ ╱ ╼ ╱ ╲ ╱ ╲ ╱ ╲ ╱ ╲ Compliant ──────── Performant Nasdaq: ✅ Compliant (strict KYC/AML) ✅ Performant (low latency) ❌ Permissionless (high barriers to entry) Hyperliquid: ✅ Permissionless (protocol level) ✅ Compliant (frontend level, optional) ✅ Performant (200k orders/sec, <0.2s latency) This is the breakthrough. By separating the layers, Hyperliquid solves the trilemma. What This Means for You If you're a trader: • Access to any asset, any time, from anywhere • Choose your frontend based on your needs (KYC vs no-KYC, fees, UX) • Trade with confidence (all transactions on-chain, auditable) If you're a builder: • Free infrastructure (orderbooks, matching engine, clearing) • Monetize via builder codes (earn fees from trades) • Focus on product, not infrastructure • Launch fast, iterate quickly If you're a project: • Permissionless listing (no gatekeepers) • Guaranteed liquidity (HIP-2 Hyperliquidity) • Exposure across all frontends • No politics, just auction price Nasdaq is a company that controls a trading platform. Hyperliquid is a protocol that enables infinite trading platforms. This isn't just a decentralized version of Nasdaq. It's what Nasdaq would look like if it were built from first principles in 2025, with everything we've learned about the internet, open protocols, and permissionless innovation. The future of finance isn't one platform to rule them all. It's a neutral infrastructure layer where thousands of platforms compete to serve users better. That infrastructure layer is Hyperliquid. Sources: docs.trade.xyz/about-trade-x… hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyper… listingcenter.nasdaq.com/ cmegroup.com/markets/equitie…
18
34
247
23,268
Elysium upgrade 04 is live on @liquidterminal: fees by app. Every contract on the Elysium testnet ranked by the fees its transactions paid, over 24h, 7d or 30d. Grouped by deployer too, so one team's contracts add up. Last 24h: 501,951 transactions, 70% of the fees from app contracts, the top one alone at 23%. On Elysium, apps are set to get a share of what they generate. Now you can see who is generating it. liquidterminal.xyz/elysium/f… Hyperliquid.
1
4
316
Liquid Terminal is free and open source, front and back. github.com/Yaugourt/liquidte… github.com/Yaugourt/LiquidTe… If it helps you, donations keep it running: 0x5cf220ac4bab057b88838a651346164f813b9f89
56
Most TWAPs on Hyperliquid are buying right now. 456 running, $40.6M left to buy against $7.8M left to sell. Most of that buy side is $31.7M on $SKHX , a HIP-3 market, from two TWAPs with more than two days left. hyperliquid:native is the exception: $3.75M net left to sell, mostly spot. liquidterminal.xyz/dashboard Hyperliquid.
5
592
Your .hl name now shows up across @liquidterminal. Explorer, wallet pages, data tables, the live wallet feed and Telegram alerts. Avatar, bio and socials come straight from your @hlnames profile. Type a .hl name in the search and it opens the wallet. No name yet? Mint one without leaving the site, in USDC or HYPE. liquidterminal.xyz/names Hyperliquid.
1
1
4
444
Liquid Terminal is free and open source. github.com/Yaugourt/liquidte… If it helps you, donations keep it running: 0x5cf220ac4bab057b88838a651346164f813b9f89
101
The first USDC reserve yield payment to Hyperliquid is on-chain. It is the first hard data point on what AQAv2 is worth to the protocol, so I pulled the numbers. 1. What got paid 14,580,777.21 USDC landed on the USDC system interest address (0x50...00) on Oct 3, 02:43 UTC. It covers 30 daily readings, Aug 27 to Sep 25, paid 8 days after the interval closed, which is the schedule the docs describe. From there it goes to the Assistance Fund, which buys $HYPE. 2. The rate it implies The settled AQA rate is not published anywhere, so I backed it out of the payment. Treasury balance on HyperEVM, read at the first block of each UTC day: $5.65B on average over the 30 days (low $5.45B on Sep 17, high $6.16B on Sep 24). 14,580,777 / ($5.65B x 30 days) x 365 = 3.14% a year. On a 360-day count it is 3.10%. The protocol gets about 90% of the cost-adjusted yield, so the cost-adjusted rate on the reserves sits around 3.5%. 3. How big that is for Hyperliquid Same 30 days, Aug 27 to Sep 25: about $65.8M of trading fee revenue (perp, spot, HIP-1, HIP-3, HIP-4, priority fees left out). The reserve yield adds 22% on top of that, without a single trade behind it. At today's $6.07B in the treasury and the same rate, it runs at about $190M a year. The Nov 2 payment should be around $15.7M if both hold. 4. What it buys At $88.59 (Oct 3, 13:30 UTC), 14.58M USDC is about 164.6K $HYPE, roughly a week of Assistance Fund buybacks. 5. Limits The rate is implied, not published. A different day count or sampling time moves it by a few bps. The treasury address is not named anywhere official. It is thehe linked contract, the split the docs require. The public HyperEVM RPC answers past-block calls with the latest state. Read history there and you get 2.92% instead of 3.14%. Use archive nodes. As of Oct 3, 13:30 UTC the payment has not reached the Assista Sources Docs: hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyper… Payment: liquidterminal.xyz/explorer/… Live tracking: liquidterminal.xyz/hype/rese… Hyperliquid.
1
3
36
1,844
Liquid Terminal is free and open source, everything you see is in the repo. github.com/Yaugourt/liquidte… If it saves you time, you can support the work here: 0x5cf220ac4bab057b88838a651346164f813b9f89 Hyperliquid.
4
156
USDC has been an Aligned Quote Asset (AQAv2) on @HyperliquidX for months, with @coinbase and @circle staked behind it. Today the first reserve yield payment landed, so we built the place to follow it on Liquid Terminal. The page shows every 30-day interval, the treasury balance it is charged on, the rate each payment implies, and where the USDC sits between the protocol's interest address and the Assistance Fund. All read from the chain. The bot now pings you on Telegram when a payment lands, and again when it reaches the Fund and turns into $HYPE buybacks. liquidterminal.xyz/hype/rese… t.me/liquidterminalbot Hyperliquid.
5
1
40
1,966
Liquid Terminal is free and open source, everything you see is in the repo. github.com/Yaugourt/liquidte… If it saves you time, you can support the work here: 0x5cf220ac4bab057b88838a651346164f813b9f89 Hyperliquid.
1
183
Yaugourt.hl retweeted
Hypedexer will be in Singapore from October 4 to 9. If you build on Hyperliquid and want to talk data, our DMs are open. Let's meet.
1
1
227
Trust me, follow @sentralcash. Hyperliquid.
Almost a year off CT, a lot’s happened since, but still betting on Hyperliquid. Took some time away from crypto, and along the way started building @sentralcash with @sumfxn. Back now with a lot to share. Here’s a first look at what we’ve been working on.
2
1
23
2,931
Elysium upgrade 03 is live on @liquidterminal: the transaction inspector 🔎 Paste any @Enter_Elysium tx hash and read it like a human: what was called, what moved, what it cost. liquidterminal.xyz/elysium/t…
3
5
29
1,680
Honest limit: internal calls aren't shown yet. No public Elysium RPC exposes tracing, and the page says so instead of guessing. Upgraded every day. Tomorrow: more.
1
76
Liquid Terminal is free and open source. Star it, fork it, build on it: github.com/Yaugourt/liquidte… Want to support the work? 0x5cf220ac4bab057b88838a651346164f813b9f89
1
75
Yaugourt.hl retweeted
Our MCP server now reads Elysium. 8 new tools for @Enter_Elysium testnet: blocks, transactions, logs, batches, the bridge, tokens and any address. Ask Claude or Cursor what moved on Elysium today. It runs the calls.
2
1
7
356
Day 2 of upgrading Elysium on Liquid Terminal every day. New today: deploy contracts. Simulate the creation on live state, then send it from your own wallet once every check passes. What's inside 🧵
2
2
17
694
Also shipped: a security pass on everything added since launch. Bounded inputs, stricter rate limits, ingestion that testnet spam can't stall.
1
60
Liquid Terminal is free and open source (MIT). Code: github.com/Yaugourt/liquidte… Support the work: 0x5cf220ac4bab057b88838a651346164f813b9f89 Data powered by @hypedexer. More tomorrow.
1
70