What if your best lesson, sharpest pitch, or most trusted framework could serve 1,000 people at once—and still feel one-on-one? That's what our team @MeetResona makes possible. Resona is a professional live AI agent built for creators and educators, turning your existing materials into interactive live sessions. With Resona, what you know finally earns what it's worth ⬇️ >Explain, answer, and adapt as users interrupt and ask questions in real time. >Deliver personalized service at scale. >Switch seamlessly between 36 languages. >Set your own session duration and price, or offer it for free. Meet Resona today. Create your own live session for free.

The butterfly weathering the storm after countless hardships,shout out to the Manus team.

Finally, we got the resona.ai root domain. Now you can use it to log into Resona! We'll also be opening up a portion of the waitlist. If you need an invite code, feel free to DM me.

This is a really cool use case! It is great to see our users using Resona to create content for different live sessions. Shout-out to Mr. Liao! It's amazing how this lets people read and understand ECCV papers in a completely new way.

The best part of building Resona: seeing users create something they’re excited to share. This time, @CoderJeffLee turned a GEO article into a hands-on lesson you can learn from—and have a conversation with. When a question pops up mid-read, like “So how would I apply this to my own website?”, the conversation keeps going. This is the next step we’ve imagined for content. And we’re starting to see people take it.

Our launch video just passed 1 million views 🎉 Even more worth celebrating is finally seeing how creators and educators are using Resona in real world settings. Come create and try your own Live Session on resona.click P.S. Inspired by the wonderfully playful work of @glitter_11924.

Ethan is right, and I'd take it one step further. "Explain it simply" makes the idea smaller. "Explain it with what I already know" keeps the idea and changes where you enter it. Compound interest is a jar of coins for a five-year-old, a follower count that suddenly jumps for a teenager, an amortization schedule for someone already paying a mortgage. Same idea, three entry points, each starting from something that person already trusts. The content stays the same. The way in changes. That adaptation is not a nice extra; it's the thing that decides whether the knowledge lands at all. Traditional formats can't work this way. You record the explanation once, for the person you imagined while making it. Everyone else gets the same opening, and the ones who don't fit it quietly drop off.

8 days to go! Stay tuned for Resona. Turn your static content into a real-time interactive live session!

Your best employee leaves on Friday. By Monday, their best workflow is gone. @gregisenberg makes a strong case for treating the instructions, examples, taste, and process behind good work as company assets. Teams can share them, improve them, and keep them when someone leaves. Experts face the same problem. A content library captures what they know, but not how they explain it, what they notice, the questions they ask, or how they move someone forward. Too much of that disappears after a call. We’re building Resona to keep it working: turning an expert’s knowledge, style, and process into interactive sessions that guide people when the expert isn’t in the room.

My biggest takeaways from @OpenAI's Head of Design @iansilber: 1. Designers are the unhappiest people in tech right now, and Ian has a theory for why. My tech workforce survey found that of all roles, designers are the most overwhelmed, anxious, tired—and least likely to recommend their role to others. Ian's explanation is that engineers have found incredible productivity gains from AI, sometimes 10X-ing or 100X-ing their work, while designers haven't. In part, because the design process is inherently messy—you try something, it sucks, you try again, you gather feedback, you realign a large org. 2. Nobody has the new design process figured out yet—which means nobody is behind. Ian’s message to designers feeling behind—whether they’re early-career, late-career, or have never designed anything—is that nobody has this figured out, including people inside OpenAI. Whatever seems cutting-edge today will look archaic within a year, let alone a month. In Ian’s words, “I strongly believe this is the best time in the world to be a designer.” 3. The designers who are thriving are constantly experimenting with new ways of working. The differentiator is whether AI has made someone feel more capable. Ian sees this at OpenAI: designers who approach tools with curiosity and a willingness to experiment find they can move through far more ideas, express themselves more fully, and raise the quality of their thinking. Throw an idea into an agent at the very start (to think it through, to prototype it), try new ways of working without needing them to be the final answer, and re-test constantly, because what didn’t work yesterday might work today. 4. Ian’s most counterintuitive advice for overwhelmed design teams is: do less. Instead of designing something new—extend an existing feature, build on an existing component, or question whether the thing needs to exist at all. That instinct connects to the skill he says is becoming most important: systems thinking. Rather than shipping one-off siloed experiences, OpenAI tries to build primitives that compose (the way built building blocks early on), so the product feels like one cohesive thing and the model can reason about how to pull the pieces together. 5. ChatGPT may have the widest audience spectrum in history. The same product serves someone picking tonight’s recipe and someone automating their factory in Japan. Ian’s team operates on the idea of capability overhang—the vast majority of users tap a sliver of its value—so they keep the mainline experience extremely simple, put cutting-edge features where the people who care will find them (the desktop app, Codex), and only distill something into the default once it no longer requires a mode or a switch. 6. The PM/eng/design roles are blurring, but they’re not going away. Marc Andreessen described PMs, engineers, and designers as a three-way standoff, each convinced the other roles will disappear. Ian’s take is that the lines have always been blurry (he’s seen product-manager-archetype designers and polish-archetype designers his whole career) and they’re getting blurrier, but at any real scale you still need people responsible for different things, because one person who can design, engineer, align a company, and rally teams is vanishingly rare. 7. Ian’s hot take: AI is already an incredible product designer. AI isn’t better than humans at visual design yet—but is, broadly, genuinely great. And, unlike any designer in history, it’s accessible to every single person. Humans still have the edge where there’s no training data: understanding what people need, watching them use things, and inventing new paradigms that people haven’t asked for. Multi-touch on the iPhone, Instagram feeds, Snapchat’s disappearing messages—none of that could be pattern-matched from what came before. 8. OpenAI designs at two speeds. For parts of ChatGPT, which is used by over 1 billion people, they obsess—“We try 100 things, and we throw out 99, and we finally ship one,” often with full A/B testing and user research behind it. For other things, like much of Codex, they can go from idea to ship in four hours, building in public for instant feedback. 9. The “super app” vision is one universal input that knows when to answer quickly, or chat, or just go do the work. Ian’s north star for ChatGPT’s broad consumer base: you shouldn’t have to think about how it works, which model you’re on, or what speed you’re using. Expose those controls for the people who need them; make the default great for most. The experience gets more proactive, with richer voice input, more interactive visual outputs, and durable workflows you reuse instead of starting from scratch each session. ChatGPT Work already hints at this with suggestions from calendar and Slack. Voice just took a step-change toward feeling natural. “The design job is simplifying while the capability surface explodes.” 10. Even the head of design at OpenAI spent his first stretch feeling like he was bad at the job. Ian arrived intimidated—GPT-4 had just come out and he didn’t feel he truly understood it—and stepped into a role scaling faster than anything he’d managed before. When he talked to friends who had led large design teams, they all felt exactly the same way, and an impartial mentor or buddy outside the company turned imposter syndrome into shared, solvable challenges. His broader advice for everyone in the field right now points in the same direction: be humble about how early this all is, have fun with it, and focus on the outcome—“We’re here to make great software that people love.”