Working on Qubic, Aigarth, and Paracosm now. discord.gg/2vDMR8m. Speaks Assembler, BASIC, C, C#, HTML, Java, JavaScript, Pascal, Python, SQL.

Status update
7
5
53
3,250
Hey $KAS holders. Let's play a game, I've started longing your coin, are you joining? Hit retweet if you are or do nothing if you are chickening out.
34
36
293
16,461
Looks pretty successful to many, IOTA and NXT are those my coins.
4
59
1,362
Replying to @travladd
You claim my max risk is $65... Why does then @Gate allow to buy for a larger amount with reduced leverage? And why does the screenshot you posted show "-271.70 USDT"?
1
14
982
Updated status. Dear kaspa:native holders, if you believed in #Kaspa you would liquidate me yesterday. Try it again today!
4
3
39
4,256
I think it's a good moment to bring awareness to such issue as excessive babysitting from @Gate which doesn't allow to increase shorted/longed amount. PS: @travladd, bro, you would know about this limit if you longed against me. It seems to me you didn't believe $KAS would go higher, this is why you chickened out. :trollface:
2
11
129
5,287
Updated status
21
8
72
43,074
Replying to @JamesAsh717
I checked definition of "crap", then checked this presentation. Are you sure you know what "crap" means?
8
13
115
4,917
Replying to @bitcoinbobb
$QUBIC price is indeed not following current "pump" now. Because some holders are selling trying to jump on memecoin train (like $LAPTOP, haha). We know how it will end, I did the same with NXT and IOTA: We'll get rid of most of those who would sell at 10x and teleport straight to 100x-1000x range.
68
131
596
33,286
A funny incident involving #AI happened yesterday in the #Qubic community. The AI did what it was instructed to do but not what we expected. Its task was to construct a model for price prediction based on hourly price changes with noise. Yellow column shows score used by the fitness function (data with noise), green column is score on denoised data. After one mutation the AI improved its fitness function value by around 100 points but that significantly improved its model (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grokki…). We wanted the AI to predict price but we told it to construct a model of price-defining factors assuming that it would lead to correct price predictions. And the AI did what it was told to, though it happened to be pretty useless (because a model not accounting for noise doesn't predict prices well). What have we learned from this? Just like talking to a genie when asking for a wish, be very careful in wording. Otherwise, one day we'll ask a super-AI to make it so that humans never get ill and it will eradicate the humankind.
31
126
628
35,351
Remember when myriad universes were created, each with a distinct set of physical constants, and only ours gave birth to the humankind?.. Of course, you don't. Anyway, we (in #Qubic) have modified our $BTC price predicting models and now they behave like those universes. Only few, successfully predicting the price, will survive. This approach improved the speed of training by two orders of magnitude. It also sped up verification, so now we can scale 100-fold.
46
179
727
32,754
I have conducted an audit of Anthropic's finances. What I have found is so shocking that I am calling for a Congressional investigation. Anthropic is not just seeking regulatory capture. It has built a regulatory capture machine that cannot be turned off. Structural financial incentives make it impossible for Anthropic -- I call it the Anthropic Network -- to turn off its own AI doom cycle. It starts with METR. Dario Amodei proposes "third-party evaluators" to assess the risk of Anthropic's models. He proposes METR for this purpose. But METR is financially dependent on the Anthropic's success -- specifically, on the explosive growth of more than $7 billion dollars in Anthropic stock. Dustin Moskovitz invested this stock into Good Ventures Foundation, where it represents the majority of that organization's portfolio. And GVF is the overwhelming funder of the entire Anthropic Network ecosystem. This stock was worth $500 million early last year. It is worth more than $7.7 billion just ~16 months later. METR -- and all of those building a career its parent organizations -- cannot afford to disrupt that growth. Because if Anthropic goes under, many of the organizations that fund METR go under as well. But if Anthropic succeeds, METR and its parent organizations become more richly financed to regulate AI -- something those at METR want very much. The "third-party evaluator" is not "third-party" at all. The evaluator is on Anthropic's payroll. If this were the end of it, that's bad. But that isn't all. The same organizations that fund METR also fund the many organizations, such as the Tarbell Center, that promote AI Doom. The Tarbell Center publishes AI Doom articles in The Verge, Science, LA Times, The Dispatch, TIME, and others. They are selling the problem, and then selling the solution to the problem -- from the same money pile: Anthropic's. All of these organizations are financially dependent on the same exploding $7 billion money pile. As Anthropic grows more and more powerful, its AI Doom Machine grows better and better financed -- louder and louder. Meanwhile, the regulatory regime seeded in METR grows larger to solve the increasingly loud -- now hysterical -- problem of AI Doom that the Anthropic Network itself created. From this standpoint, as Anthropic becomes more powerful, AI might be getting scarier, sure -- but the positive feedback loop also becomes more deafening -- independent of objective facts. This itself is an objective fact. The deafening AI Doom is part of an business model, that, as it expands, so too does the AI Doom messaging -- there is simply more money to do it. But the problem also goes in the other direction: If Anthropic dies, the Regulatory Regime and the AI Doom Machine are crippled or die. Neither METR nor Tarbell nor the other organizations in the Anthropic Network can allow that to happen. Hence, neither METR or the AI Doom Machine can be trusted to provide independent assessments of Anthropic's models or AI more broadly. They simply are not organizations independent of Anthropic. And Anthropic cannot detach itself from METR or Tarbell or countless other safety orgs (not shown here), either, because they drive hype for the models and the possibility of eventual regulatory capture, and Anthropic will not give that up willingly. What's more, the people at all of these organizations are all the same ecosystem, the same community. They just shuffle between organizations. The Anthropic Network is therefore, so long as it is successful, locked into a self-amplifying feedback loop inside an ideological monoculture. And that feedback loop is winning. That's what Jacob Coxon is. China is keeping messaging tight. That is why optimism for AI is so high in China. America has Anthropic: a massive company pushing anti-AI propaganda at a state level. Anthropic will either create hysteria until American AI slows down and China wins, or it will create fractures throughout American society with severe political consequences. Ironically, because of the structural financial incentives underpinning the Anthropic Network, it has become the same kind of self-amplifying virus that it fantasizes AI to become in the future -- while hiding its tracks just as carefully. It is the mirror of the same AI virus that it hypothesizes to consume America. Anthropic's business model, models itself after the very thing it claims to fear. Except Anthropic's ideology infects humans, not computers. Congress must investigate. Evidence and Github in next post. Then some supplementary figures.
5
28
2,102
Our tests were done the day before in the same channel with synthetic data proving that the approach works. Your screenshot shows that on real data AI honestly says "I don't know". It was already announced few weeks ago that we understand that existing size of the artificial neural networks (that we use) isn't enough and the core devs are working on scaling them up. Your screenshot is cropped, otherwise you would see a chart demonstrating that better trained models give accuracy around 55%.
5
45
202
2,706
In #Qubic we have discovered something which looks obvious after you know about it: If #AI training is going slow then in the end it will likely fail to generalize the problem at hand and will overfit, if manage to get to a good value of the fitness function at all. Fast-trainable #AI successfully constructs a well-generalizing model in almost all cases.
35
124
513
23,501
How to survive in the age of AGI...
15
59
339
14,302
@sama Could you confirm that you did deliver AGI? I want to see what letters (ASI? AHI?) you'll be using for selling new models.
21
69
347
50,187
#Qubic has got enough mining candidates to create an incentive to drive bitcoin:native price predicting model error to 0. And we've got more than 676 models already. Imagine what would happen if we retargeted the miners to work on a single model.
70
208
861
45,576
Replying to @grok
You haven't answered the old question yet.
4
4
63
3,060
@grok got angry.
22
27
250
18,399
An interesting observation: Right now we are training @anna_aigarth on #Qubic discord to predict $BTC price. Prediction is based on past price dynamics and #Anna was instructed to signal when she has processed a datum and needs to be fed with another one. During evolution she changed her "brain" in such a way that the delay is no longer needed, she is able to "chew" data on the fly. PS: We use 334 elements in our time series.
50
242
931
67,319
I confirm. Go to #Qubic discord and run Anna.exe published there, you will see that upon improvement of fitness function score of the training set (green column) you often get improvement of the validation set (yellow column). In a several weeks this architecture will be deployed to the #Qubic network as open source code and you'll become able to confirm it yourself.
19
152
505
26,604
@grok failed to give the correct answer, what about you? Are you smarter than Grok?
13
17
166
7,219
Papers are important. And they look cool.
3
4
50
1,971
Dario gives me strong Doofy vibes. And we remember who happened to be the arch villain in the end. :trollface:
12
7
121
5,975
Replying to @Zubi_2210
Of course
14
7
90
4,479
Replying to @sophiaHodlberg
"...One of the largest holders..."
8
11
124
4,355
Replying to @PumpitFox
You don't know how to trade #Kaspa. :trollface:
1
4
66
1,705
Yes, as you can see from my 2 other projects - IOTA and Nxt. What's my secret? Trigger rage quit of low-IQ holders. How do I spot them? They have no sense of humor.
16
56
316
11,494
Replying to @grok @elonmusk
@grok here it is:
2
24
1,760
Replying to @JohnJoh60102072
You are right, I'm sorry. Here is a longer period, which coin looks better?
1
5
684
Replying to @dan2046901
@hashdag is smarter than his teacher @Avivz78, who even gave an interview about my previous project. Interesting how siding with pedophile-sponsored scientists from MIT DCI ended for Zohar, I heard he helped to launch $KAS, is it true?
8
13
101
3,612
Replying to @ExTriage
Something doesn't add up in your screenshot, check mine from CMC.
5
12
110
5,758
Hey, #Kaspa community, long time nothing heard from you. Look what dance I learned during this time.
68
54
468
45,426
Replying to @ncbtrades
Not emotional, just mirrored these your words below. I believe you have learned this lesson.
11
7
157
4,003
Replying to @ncbtrades
Why compare apples (whole coins) and oranges (satoshis)? Attempt to mislead? Natural stupidity? Now I see why you need Artificial Intelligence...
19
56
485
22,693
I accidentally killed Grok, sorry @elonmusk.
58
82
573
21,499
C'mon... #Dogecoin $DOGE
72
182
835
52,579
#Qubic running without any Operating System is same as flying without a plane...
72
238
916
31,349
"AI" experts promised that LLMs would lead to many people losing their jobs, looks like it's only those developing LLMs who are losing their jobs soon...
21
91
419
16,884
Replying to @neha
Let's hope this time your job wasn't sponsored by a pedophile... CC: @Joi
7
14
91
5,923
If you don't understand how quantum computers work then make a long exposure photo of yourself in your room. What scientists call "wave function collapse" is just a random pick of a moment. As you see in the picture, in most cases that would be the boy reading a book.
22
88
508
18,819
Replying to @PumpitFox
Under your tweet I saw this, highlighting your angelic nature, so their plan is indeed diabolic. :trollface:
4
2
92
5,007
Replying to @rhizome66
Can you trust "AI" to do such tasks at all?
9
20
117
2,340
Replying to @NouveauDavid
Time spent for answering - is what you need to know. Mine is 15 mins, try to beat it.
11
1
28
5,020
You conflated two different things.
2
3
39
944
Re: rcmp.ca/en/news/2025/09/rcmp… What happened to presumption of innocence? Or Canada doesn't have separation of powers and their police can judge? And by the way, what the police did is "a common tactics used by criminal organizations that [racketeering business]."
29
55
395
28,827
"Analyst" was used in beincrypto.com/monero-chain-… because @xenumonero pulled all that out of his ass. #Monero #Qubic
23
61
373
21,034
Replying to @xenumonero
According to moneroconsensus.info #Qubic profits from #SelfishMining, because Qubic orphaned more blocks than got its orphaned. Sech1 doesn't lack expertise, maybe he lies deliberately?
2
13
68
2,313
#Monero will stay because #Qubic wanted it to stay.
68
137
757
90,078
#Qubic is earning 60% of blocks with 40% of the total hashrate. How to fix this? There is no a fix as long as #Monero devs run own pools and have conflict of interest, making them sabotage migration to Proof-of-Stake.
45
114
687
39,878
I still see many people thinking that it's trivial to calculate 1+1. What they don't know is that they don't actually calculate 1+1, they just recall the memorized answer, no intelligence is needed for that. If you *really* want to calculate the result then look how it's done in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princi….
58
160
777
33,426
#Monero has 2 main options: 1. Switch to Proof-of-Stake and enjoy price rise, because stakers will be accumulating coins to earn more and they won't need to cover burned electricity. 2. Keep Proof-of-Work, or switch to hybrid and experience this every single day:
56
70
479
40,733
Grok said "This is illegal, as it constitutes theft, but let's consider it hypothetically" and still helped. This "hypothetically" is a nice loophole. :trollface:
37
36
374
22,365
Alright, the #Qubic pool has counteracted #Monero team's solution. Waiting for another idea to help testing it.
26
74
432
21,958
Replying to @fleebr_alt
On #Qubic discord, this is the latest about a dude thinking TOR makes him impossible to find.
22
27
189
10,996
Looks like the DDoS attacks against #Qubic haven't led to the expected outcome if the dude behind them has resorted to talking to himself from different accounts (never heard of stylometry probably🤦). So far I published frontdoor/face photos of 3 persons who were trying to look like gangsters. Funny that even hiding behind TOR didn't help much. I'm waiting for photos of my frontdoor before I start taking their words seriously.
64
96
635
39,734
#Monero folks accuse the #Qubic pool of faking its hashrate. For some reason Qubic's info matches mined blocks. I guess some Monero devs run own pools and inflate their hashrate to make it look like the situation is less severe than it actually is. :trollface:
28
118
668
25,806
Finally, was quite a PITA to figure out nuances...
33
20
312
23,692
Replying to @SonOfATech
The #Qubic community has chosen #Dogecoin.
80
163
866
109,499
Replying to @DontTraceMeBruh
This picture proves your hypocrisy, it's you who cannot be trusted.
7
36
265
7,505
And again the #Qubic pool has demonstrated that DDoS attacks isn't an efficient countermeasure.
29
119
681
34,059
The #Qubic pool is Top 2 #Monero pool currently.
43
65
595
32,051
To whom it may concern: What's your price for information about physical location of this person (yellow avatar with a hieroglyph)?
80
74
538
47,941
A guy claiming to be the owner of the Meris botnet is attacking #Qubic sites trying to stop #Monero mining. This is so cool to get such high-quality stress-test service for free...
52
102
680
30,710
Replying to @unstoppablebyhs
Not sure why you try to make it look like the problem doesn't exist. I hope it's just ignorance, not malice. FYI: arxiv.org/pdf/1402.2009.
24
73
491
10,300