serving from both ends is why I’m the life of the party. you wouldn’t understand.

I made an OpenCode plugin and a Cursor plugin for my linter. Never done either before but it’s quite fun. I have so many endless ideas.
14
405
I’m starting to think of programming like art. We used to intentionally make every paint stroke. Made sure the canvas which we created on was good. And now with AI, much of the vibe coding is just happy little accidents as Bob Ross would say. Sometimes it works and sometimes it’s something pretty covering something ugly. Most of the time, I’m still the intentional painter though.
1
8
439
My husband sent this to me and I couldn’t stop laughing. I want to (and don’t want to) do this.
1
19
965
I bought a new printer. I just unboxed it to set it up. So I put the cartridge in. I pulled the cords out of the box. There was only a power cord, interesting. Plugged it in. Examined the printer... There's no way to plug it into the computer via USB. You can only wifi print. What the heck? The one thing that I knew all my life was you plug your printer into the computer and it will connect. Now I need wifi to print?! That's so dumb. It's fine. But it's dumb.
3
9
861
From now on in order to chat with me over video, you must wear a post it on your head with today's date and saying that I'm cool. Otherwise, access denied. Unless I know you. In which case, I'll think about it.
Introducing Griffin, the first model to pass the video Turing test. 48% of people who talked to it live thought it was a real human. Previous systems have had a pass rate <3%. It is #1 on NVIDIA's benchmark for full-duplex AI video. It’s the first Human Interaction Model (HIM).
Community note
The 48% figure and "video Turing test" claim are from Tavus's own study of 54 one-minute calls, not independently verified or using a standard protocol. Griffin-Lite leads NVIDIA's VideoFDB benchmark on their public leaderboard. cellcog.ai/blog/tavus-gri… research.nvidia.com/labs/amri/proj… tech-ish.com/2026/10/02/tav…
2
10
1,210
My kid is learning her first recital piece and I’m literally making her play the same line over and over and over again. It’s how I practiced as a kid and even now. One line at a time, many reps. That muscle memory goes a long way. She’s skeptical but she’ll see the light.
3
11
783
I guess Clef works with my code taste linter. That's pretty cool. I have so many ideas on what I can now do with it (after I delete the copious amounts of logging I added to debug).
7
633
Hey @specialkdelslay rate this pie.
1
7
382
I’m switching to this. I have so many ideas I can do with vision.
Replying to @michellechen
the 𝚌𝚕𝚎𝚏 models have a few unique properties worth writing home about: ▶ vision encoder: classify images, not just text ▶ trained for 256k context (64k hosted) ▶ clef-flash around 13x faster than Jev ▶ drop-in jev api compatible ▶ open source under apache 2.0 ▶ hosted on workers ai, taking advantage of edge GPUs for latency ▶ fine-tune it on your own data with our new RL platform
1
5
697
Where have you been all of my life
¡Acaba de salir Git 2.56! Y trae algo nuevo interesante: $ git branch --delete-merged Para borrar fácil las ramas que ya han sido fusionadas.
2
1
17
2,648
I spend 10 dollars a month on AI subscriptions in total. Used to be 20 when I paid for Cursor. But I moved on from that.
Crazy how we're normalizing a $500 AI subscription. That's a whole ass car payment. Wouldn't surprise me to eventually see Pro 1000 plans at some point.
1
8
679
It’s a whole new ball game when talking to your kids about working really hard and really committing to a goal and having something to show for it when you’re a programmer with a GitHub full of unfinished projects. Don’t tell my kids. 🤫
1
12
484
I've been testing my code taste linter by vibe coding a lot and letting the agent use it as a feedback loop. Then I review the code myself and see which rules need to be added or adjusted. It's getting pretty close to producing code I'd write myself with much less feedback. I've also been creating as many evals as possible across different code patterns so I have a baseline level of confidence that the rules behave the way I expect. This feels like caring about the back of the couch. Even if one day, no one reads code anymore, if it's something I can open up and feel good about still, that would be pretty awesome.
1
6
366
Daughter: If you could be any character from a book or movie, who would you be? Me: God from the Bible Daughter: But it took 6 days to make earth. You'd barely be able to do anything.
3
20
691
I love how cheap Jev is. Despite testing and running 5000+ evaluations, it's still barely costing anything. Also really enjoying this code taste linter project.
13
486
I played a lot of Warcraft and the likes. So much of it.
8
31
1,272
Today, I played with Jev and evals working on my code taste linter. And I read a lot of things about system one models. I also had a girls night with my daughters until super late (way later than I should have been out with them at least). It was a really good day/night.
11
480
Despite this taking numerous hours, I reverted it because it was a dumb idea. That's just how it goes. You get an idea. Implement it. Then you see your idea is bad. And you discard it. But the great thing is my brain always has more ideas.
Added the auto fix flag. The output is a little verbose and I need to speed this up but it's looking decent right now. Spent many hours on this. Being able to enforce personal preferences (like how comments are made, how booleans are named, etc) is going to be so nice.
1
514
The average person won’t build their own software with AI. People could cook every meal, grow food, repair things, or build furniture. Most don’t. We pay for convenience, reliability, polish, support, and our time. Saturday thoughts. Time to workout. Bye.
5
37
1,353
Ironically pretty close to how I built my code taste linter. Send most of my code to Jev first, Jev decides what needs changing based on rules I set, send to LLM to propose the changes, send back to Jev to validate changes and if all goes well, apply the changes.
Jev Founder, Diogo Almeida, just released a 12-page PDF on how to use Jev with LLMs It is more useful than most paid AI courses: this is a 10-step blueprint on how to build a faster, cheaper and more controllable AI system around Claude, Codex, Grok or any other LLM: step 1 → split the responsibilities: the LLM generates, Jev makes bounded semantic decisions and deterministic code keeps authority step 2 → build the state: give Jev the current request, relevant evidence, policy and proposed action instead of sending the entire conversation step 3 → choose the right primitive: Choice selects a route, Score evaluates an ordered rubric and Noul returns the probability that a statement is true step 4 → replace giant evaluation prompts with atomic questions: intent, urgency, evidence, risk and scope become separate typed decisions step 5 → put Jev before the LLM: select the context, tools, provider and workflow before paying for an expensive generative call step 6 → give the LLM a bounded job: once Jev selects the route, the model receives only the instructions, files and tools required for that branch step 7 → put Jev after the LLM: check whether the result answers the request, uses sufficient evidence and stays inside the permitted scope step 8 → route by confidence: high-confidence low-risk cases proceed automatically, uncertain cases request more context and consequential actions go to review step 9 → batch independent decisions: ask multiple Choice, Score and Noul questions over one shared state instead of creating another LLM call for every judgment step 10 → record the complete decision receipt: state version, question, probabilities, selected route, model, latency, outcome and human override most AI courses teach you how to write a bigger prompt this 12-page guide teaches you how to build the control system around every prompt the result: smaller contexts, fewer unnecessary LLM calls, safer tool execution and decisions you can actually inspect, test and improve Send this PDF and the original Jev article to Claude Code or Codex and start rebuilding one expensive LLM decision at a time ↓
3
677