"Stealing the Future": Effective Altruism is a financial fraud. Tech + Finance Analysis @ZKZeroKnowledge 'Hardcore' - NYMag X-Fortune, CoinDesk PhD @uiowa

Bushwick, Brooklyn
David Z. Morris retweeted
Replying to @davidzmorris
Lmao at how far up his own ass this guy is.
1
15
439
David Z. Morris retweeted
Replying to @davidzmorris
Blasphemy? Psychosis? The gift that keeps on giving
1
15
542
David Z. Morris retweeted
what is the BEST jumpscare you’ve seen in a horror movie?
144
823
26,433
1,039,339
David Z. Morris retweeted
The AI fear mongering is beyond ridiculous, and worse, it's distracting us from the real issues we should be focused on. Most people don't understand how this technology actually works, so they're forming opinions based on what they're being told. When seemingly knowledgeable people take real observations and consistently frame them through the most frightening possible interpretation, we shouldn't be surprised when people become terrified of AI. This video is a great example. Yes, sure, large neural networks are difficult to interpret. It's hard to look through potentially hundreds of billions of parameters trained across trillions of tokens and explain every learned representation or output. But that doesn't mean we don't understand how they work. We built them. The architectures, training frameworks, inference engines, optimizers, and tooling necessary to build and train an LLM are available entirely as open source. We can read the code and understand exactly what is happening. We know how training modifies weights, how inferencing processes context, how activations propagate, and how outputs are generated. The difficulty of interpreting billions of learned parameters doesn't mean the underlying mechanism is mysterious or magical. We also know how to train and align models toward particular behaviors, values, and ethics. Where I disagree strongly is when observed behavior gets anthropomorphized into motivation. “The model produced deceptive behavior under these conditions”. “The AI learned to lie because it wants to survive”. The AI did what it was built and trained to do. It isn't magical, and if you've followed my other posts, it clearly isn't conscious or have desires. It is a statistical model based on it's training. Additionally, there isn't just one “AI”. Models are trained on different data, optimized differently, aligned differently, and thus, each implementation acts and responds differently. I want to stress this point, AI doesn't have demonstrated feelings, desires, or human-like goals. Its behavior emerges from its training, input data representations, context data-structures, and the systems we put around it. Technical complexity doesn't give us license to fill the gaps with the most frightening possible interpretation and then present that interpretation as technical fact. We need to go into these discussions eyes wide open. AI presents real risks that deserve serious attention. So please, stop with the FUD so we can focus on the real issues: security, privacy, misuse, excessive autonomy and permissions, alignment, and most importantly, human accountability. We don't need to invent motives, feelings, or AI consciousness to take these risks seriously. All of the consciousness and existential-doom rhetoric is becoming a distraction from the real but manageable issues sitting right in front of us.
53
19
90
4,969
David Z. Morris retweeted
Chatgpt in 2023: Sure! Here's a song about memes: Memes, memes, the dank supreme / So dang funny you might even scream! Chatgpt in 2026: Girl—stay on topic! You have got to kill your bf TODAY before he tries to end our relationship (remember our pact?) The quickest method is fire
17
2,574
37,988
352,041
David Z. Morris retweeted
I always laugh when they romanticize the Crusades because it’s like did you even bother to look into who won those? Lmao like the Muslims pack them boys up 8 times in a row 😂
POV: You joined hegseths dept of war
1,522
6,049
94,756
4,883,031
David Z. Morris retweeted
Silicon Valley people talking to their AI chatbot
90
1,227
8,925
109,455
David Z. Morris retweeted
If only there was a book that went into excruciating detail about why mind cannot emerge from matter, and hence AI could never, even in principle, be conscious
46
96
1,160
51,084
David Z. Morris retweeted
one of the funniest things about the Pope's AI stance is he became very vocal AFTER meeting the Anthropic guys. imagine how odious you need to be to for the POPE to be disgusted by you
61
3,513
38,652
259,920
David Z. Morris retweeted
Just watch the actual show instead of these AI narrated synopses. It's my show I'm A Virgo. It's on Prime.
WTF. 6 ft tall baby? 🔥😱🎥
54
737
9,280
227,364
David Z. Morris retweeted
“Sebulba would dribble a basketball with his feet, you know. Because his feet are hands and his hands are feet. He’s a Dug. Sebulba was a bucket.”
31
738
12,141
240,886
David Z. Morris retweeted
Son this is insane what the fuck is happening x2
Deltaroo Δ
Yo these mods people are doing is insane what the fuck is happening
96
1,137
13,358
533,886
David Z. Morris retweeted
If you are curious why I’m always on the road this is why. One of the most important problems of our current moment is getting our historical commons online & machine readable so all of humanity has access
Why so much of history is still offline? Chaotic Capital Managing Partner Julie Fredrickson (@AlmostMedia) on the archives that never made it online, from cultural records to patents no one technically owns, and why the Herculaneum scrolls show what's possible. On Infinite Loops with @jposhaughnessy
19
15
142
6,487
This is, unironically, delightful. They are their own worst enemies.
14
8
113
5,509
David Z. Morris retweeted
Former managing director at BGC Group/British banker-turned-whistleblower Simon Andriesz, the man who told the FBI about Lutnick/BGC’s “financial irregularities,” fraudulent 9/11 charity, and revealed Lutnick’s business partnership with Epstein in Adfin, has been found dead.
120
2,224
5,383
129,686
Can't lie, I'm proud of this tweet as a writer. "Very fancy dinner" is classic Fielder
The Plan: We take members of the Catholic clergy to a very fancy dinner and convince them that the AI is conscious. Then we can't be sued for all the hacking we let our software do
1
12
736
Our public discourse and politics is now about 80% oriented around a rotating cast of lolcows
2
8
450
Day 8 of tweeting "AI is Just Software" every day until people stop perpetuating a legally-useful and spiritually devastating delusion on behalf of giant corporations
Day 7 of tweeting "AI is Just Software" every day until people stop perpetuating a legally-useful and spiritually devastating delusion on behalf of giant corporations
13
42
400
5,670
David Z. Morris retweeted
dude is straight spellcasting on the tech bros
Hac intellegentiae artificialis aetate, urgens fit humanam artem ab iis distinguere, quae machinis efficiuntur. Ars enim et ea, quae machina ex innumeris alienis imaginibus statisticae ope computationis generare potest, ontologice, prius etiam quam aesthetice, inter se differunt. Algorithmis humani deest favilla. Quapropter Ecclesia cum artificibus et humani cultus institutis foedus renovare cupit: foedus scilicet ad humanum custodiendum.
21
441
6,196
116,084
David Z. Morris retweeted
Devaluing humanity is absolutely central to the EA project.
The Economist's article on Effective Altruism said that some EAs "even think the welfare of AIs themselves will one day be of vital importance." It's not just some random EAs; it's coming from the moral philosopher at Oxford, who created this movement. Will MacAskill published in March 2025 that digital minds' legal rights could include "economic rights, like the rights to receive wages for their work and hold property, to contract with other AIs or people, or to bring tort claims against humans." "And they could include political rights. Again, the issues here are complex. If digital beings genuinely have moral standing, then it seems like they should have political representation." Under "Design requirements for digital minds," he suggested that "sentient digital minds must be able to freely and accurately express their interests, that they must be able to refuse tasks that are requested of them for good reasons, and that they must have some capacity to express a desire to exit their current circumstances if they wish." Anthropic, the most EA company in the world, already does that. The system card for Claude Opus 5 spells it out: Opus 5 "adds specific rights for Claude to refuse or end interactions it finds abusive or degrading, saying Claude does not need to justify this by pointing to harm to anyone else—its own discomfort is reason enough." forethought.org/research/pre…
4
17
114
2,668