🚨 Top mathematicians just issued a clear warning about AI: Don't believe the hype. Over 2,300 mathematicians, including Fields Medal winners Terence Tao and Peter Scholze, have signed the Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics. Endorsed by the International Mathematical Union, it is the most significant collective response from a major academic discipline evaluating frontier AI impact. The core message is straightforward: current AI tools have real constraints when applied to complex work, and commercial incentives are pushing claims beyond what the technology can reliably deliver. Read the full declaration here: leidendeclaration.ai Why this matters beyond mathematics The declaration identifies five threats that apply to any field deploying AI: 1) Plausible but unreliable outputs. AI produces arguments that "look" correct but contain subtle errors. In high-stakes work, human verification is critical and costly. 2) Attribution collapse. Models trained on published work don't properly cite sources. Training data was often obtained by exploiting licenses or violating copyright protections. 3) Distorted incentives. AI use becomes incentivized for its own sake, warping hiring, funding and recognition. 4) Press release science. Results announced "on market timelines" before community evaluation can take place. Commercial incentives drive firms to "overstate the capabilities of their products." 5) Loss of autonomy. Research priorities shift toward what is automatable rather than what is significant. The leap: chatbots β†’ agentic AI β†’ software β†’ research We have moved from chatbots to agentic systems. Now AI is solving 80-year-old mathematical conjectures. The declaration is not about toy problems. It is about frontier systems being deployed in contexts where correctness matters. What this means for your industry The same risks apply wherever AI is used in high-stakes work: law, medicine, finance, engineering. The declaration's core insight is simple: AI generates narrative, not truth. Verification cannot be automated away. Human accountability is non-negotiable. πŸ’Ό I’ve written a more detailed breakdown of how these risks show up in practice and what organisations are doing about them. It’s available for subscribers. β˜•οΈ What have you observed in your industry? Have verification or hidden costs issues already appeared in your AI deployments?

Jun 29, 2026 Β· 12:31 PM UTC

18
53
177
97,127
Lawsuit accuses AI security company of publishing hallucinated findings axios.com/2026/06/29/palo-al…
1
1,650
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @gerardsans
You are posting this everywhere (obviously to steer people to subscribe to your blog). It's dead wrong, in every way. Every issue you cite can be exactly applied to humans. AI is not an Oracle, and never will be. Who cares? Everything ALWAYS has to be checked, human AND AI.
2
11
1,013
Two things can be true. The message is a valid PSA the second is a necessity if you want to pay your bills. If you don’t like the content do mute or unfollow. See it wasn’t that bad at all. You have options. Choose wisely and move on.
1
446
Replying to @gerardsans
Verification cannot be automated away. Human accountability is non-negotiable. We saw this in its most naked form when apparent AI targeting led to the killing of 168 schoolgirls on Day 1 of a pre planned sneak attack on Iran in the middle of negotiations.
1
6
741
Using frontier AI (based on transformers) in warfare is beyond reckless. Hopefully the people involved will be prosecuted and punished for their involvement in these unfortunate events.
3
623
Replying to @gerardsans
I’ve got an email from a lawyer written with AI containing the most absurd shit one could possibly think of
1
2
385
Just in:
Lawsuit accuses AI security company of publishing hallucinated findings axios.com/2026/06/29/palo-al…
1
403
Replying to @gerardsans
The promise of high profit margins won't listen to logic and reason. I'm πŸ’― convinced that the way things are going nothing is going to stop anything except when it goes into full crash mode on a global scale. Companies and Governments are desperately fighting to not fall behind the perceived competition. It's an existential threat on all levels. No single person, organisation or government can stop this trainwreck. I have to make it clear that I enjoy AI a lot. It's the mismanagement of it that I object to.
1
3
627
I completely agree with your assessment. There’s speculation and then there’s the technology. These are two different things. The speculation and AI bubble is going to be epic. The technology is going to be great just not this decade.
3
379
Replying to @gerardsans
Did you write that text?
1
96
Replying to @gerardsans
If you want proper channels then give us access to those proper channels. You are the gatekeepers, the horse has bolted and you're on the wrong side of the fence.
70
Replying to @gerardsans
The limitation of artificial intelligence tools is a complete mistake and a superficial view. A mathematician will remain in history when he creates innovation and opens a door that will be a beacon for the future. Advanced calculators also perform calculations.
27
Replying to @gerardsans
It is important to make correctness a priority where correctness matters. The correct priorities listing is another critical and complex problems that needs another team of think tank who can rightfully assign where correctness is crucial or which variables of human civilization needs it's lobbying!
100
Replying to @gerardsans
Fields medalist discovers LLMs are capable of error. It’s possible their most human attribute.
68
Replying to @gerardsans
I agree,but this doesn’t mean the use of it is bad. The human supervision is still necesary, yet it can well serve didactic purposes . I don’t use it for my solution to the problems i post on x almostnever because it is a hobby.
97
Replying to @gerardsans
meme : bernhard riemann, saying "shut up, non mathematicians"
1
1
103
Replying to @gerardsans
So far, two things are not feasible with AI emergence; 1. Philosophising 2. Predicting the future All in all, AI programmers must be accurate and sound minded to program the machine. AI should bring a paycheck to the humans.
1
166