🇮🇳🙏The missing chapter! ZERO FEAR MATH This is the reason - x - = + MULTI-PLAY #4 - × - Negatives Subtracted from Zero In ⁻3 × –4 the superscript ⁻ symbol in ⁻3 means 3 negatives or negative 3 The – symbol in –4 means subtract 4 times It’s red 🟥for positive and black ⬛for negative To play ⁻3 × –4 you subtract 3 negatives from ZERO 4 times So, let's subtract 3 ⬛ negatives from ZERO 4 times We can’t subtract something from nothing, so we make a zero pair with 12 positives and the 12 negatives that need to be subtracted. 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ZERO 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛3 negatives subtracted once 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛3 negatives subtracted twice 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥⬛⬛⬛3 negatives subtracted a third time 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥3 negatives subtracted a fourth time Altogether we see 12 positives 3 negatives subtracted 4 times from our zero pair ⁺12 + ⁻12 ⁺12 + ⁻12 – ⁻3 – ⁻3 – ⁻3 – ⁻3 = ⁺12 + ⁻3 + ⁻3 + ⁻3 + ⁻3 – ⁻3 – ⁻3 – ⁻3 – ⁻3 = ⁺12 ⁻3 × –4 = ⁺12 For Teachers, Parents and Scientists We use superscript ⁺ and ⁻ symbols for Multiplicands which represent units of either positive or negative Quantities. We use standard case + and – symbols for Multipliers, which on the Set of Integers, represent counts of Actions. The specific Actions are either additions to zero for multipliers with a + or subtractions from zero for multipliers with a –. A lot of science involves equal and opposite Quantities and Actions. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Many quantities cancel each other from steps left and right to negative electrons and positive positrons. So, doesn’t it make sense to start with the end in mind in Class 2 or 3 to connect basic explanations of math with basic laws of physics? For 395 years, children have been told to "just memorize the rule because I said so." No more. Math should make sense! If these posts helped you, please ♻️ SHARE this post. Every retweet helps us fix the broken curriculum and give children the gift of logic. ASK ME AND SHARE IF YOU CARE! Got a question about how this works in the classroom? Ask me below! 👇 Follow @jcrabtree to break free from broken British math to master Indian origin #ZeroFearMath 🟥⬛

🇮🇳 SHOCKING MATHS DISCOVERY⬇️ "It's been 43½ years since I set out to change the way the world teaches maths." India focussed on śūnya (empty) as the original zero. Yet, the zero in Brahmagupta’s Addition Sutra 4 is not śūnya or empty. It says समैक्यं खम् (samaikyaṃ kham) so equal-union (of opposites) is kha. Kha is what you have when positive and negative are equal. Not an empty zero. Not less than nothing. A balance where negative is NOT less than positive. Zero became empty or nothing yet the entire world, including India, lost Brahmagupta's union of equal negative and positive, as kha not as śūnya or zero. Now, the world's maths confusion can end, not with śūnya (ZERO 0), but with kha (my ZEO ⊜). 🤯 So, if you'd like to be one of the 1st in the world to find out about Brahmagupta's kha (ZEO ⊜) and how it explains everything teachers struggle to teach. 1. FOLLOW ME on X @jcrabtree 2. SUBSCRIBE on YouTube piped.video/@ZeroFearMath?su…

🙏🇮🇳🔂 The seeds of Zero Fear Math? Quantity Action, and ZEO Followers will know 1st. @jcrabtree

🙏🇮🇳 I’m an Australian 🦘 maths historian and I’m tired of watching the West take the applause for ideas India already had. Baudhāyana before Pythagoras. Āryabhaṭa before Galileo. Brahmagupta before the West even accepted zero as a number. Madhava before Newton. Pingala before Fibonacci. Ramanujan etc. Yet still the textbooks bow to Europe first. India’s gurus and rishis were not a footnote. Their ideas were copied, thinned out, renamed, and then sold back to Indian children as “Western maths.” So I’m asking Indians directly: If you could attend a talk by any 🇮🇳 Indian mathematician, living or historical, who I’ve mentioned on my X, who would you choose and why? Reply with the name. Tag a student, a teacher, or a parent who still thinks maths began in Greece. If this history was hidden from you in school, this post is for you. RT so the next generation hears the real names first. Jai Hind. @jcrabtree

🙏🇮🇳 I’m an Australian 🦘 maths historian and I’m tired of watching the West take the applause for ideas India already had. Baudhāyana before Pythagoras. Āryabhaṭa before Galileo. Brahmagupta before the West even accepted zero as a number. Madhava before Newton. Pingala before Fibonacci. Ramanujan etc. Yet still the textbooks bow to Europe first. India’s gurus and rishis were not a footnote. Their ideas were copied, thinned out, renamed, and then sold back to Indian children as “Western maths.” So I’m asking Indians directly: If you could attend a talk by any 🇮🇳 Indian mathematician, living or historical, who I’ve mentioned on my X, who would you choose and why? Reply with the name. Tag a student, a teacher, or a parent who still thinks maths began in Greece. If this history was hidden from you in school, this post is for you. RT so the next generation hears the real names first. Jai Hind. @jcrabtree