I believe nation states will keep becoming less and less relevant and that in the future everyone will be a nomad Most nation states (and well governments) barely function anymore through 100+ years of democratic baggage from laws and regulation that can't be reversed People can't save their countries or governments anymore through people's initiatives or getting into politics, because the systems are so old and in full gridlock Globalism has deservedly gotten a really bad rep the last 5 years though as we were too naive about it, but I think we should keep the good parts from it We should not take our identity from or defer our individual power to nation states ran by a political mafia class that's just perpetual robbing us and has no intention (or ability!) to actually improve society Nation states are a relatively new invention and barely 150 years old, before we had empires, kingdoms, smaller city states (kinda like municipalities) and tribes or local communities Over the years I've been increasingly red-pilled by @oskarth that nation states simply do not work and you need smaller sizes of government for things to work efficiently. Once it gets too big you get too much regulation and Kafka-esque bureaucracy and you end up with gridlock Which is Europe's entire problem right now! There's some exceptions, US and China seem to operate at large scale and are doing relatively well considering their size Anyway to get back to my point, I think it's preferable people think of themselves as global citizens, because it gives them stronger negotiation power in relation to nation states and governments as they're able to pack up and leave to where they're treated better And having people be mobile then also incentivizes other nation states (or smaller types of governance) to compete with them to attract the best people, and in response the other states will improve to attract people back Now with geopolitical tensions (like the stuff about Russia and Europe this week), it shows even more the benefit to be able to pack your bag and leave to a better place quickly is an extreme benefit now and in the future, possibly even for survival
Very cool. I’m curious: do you believe digital nomading will continue to grow given the potential disruption of all things digital that’s upon us? Sorry, had to quote to reply @levelsio :)

Sep 19, 2026 · 9:52 PM UTC

281
64
994
260,708
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @levelsio
Interesting, appreciate you sharing
9
2,131
Replying to @levelsio
Ah yes, the fantasy of being a global citizen. My favorite You can think of yourself as a global citizen as much as you want. But trying to live that way with a shitty passport is a rather eye-opening experience. There is no such thing and never be
2
23
1,536
You mean like a Malaysian passport? Or Chilean? Or Barbados? Mexican? Peruvian? Paraguayan? Because they all have amazing passports that get you to over 150+ countries The idea that most countries have bad passports is really outdated The only thing is most can't go to US, okay
3
15
1,646
Replying to @levelsio
very close to the premise of @balajis 's book "network state", if you haven't read it. it's pretty long - i never got through the full thing, i should pick it back up.
2
12
1,314
Yes I love his stuff!
1
10
1,425
Replying to @levelsio
You’ve basically repeated the thesis of “The sovereign individual” from now almost two decades back. It also explains a bit (among other reasons) why nationalism is on the raise - nations will try to build the feeling of the danger and being under attack from “others” This feeling helps to keep people in the country as they need to “protect”
4
10
935
Replying to @levelsio
The statement "everyone will be a nomad" cannot happen if a majority of global population depend on the productivity of others. Wish it wasn't the case. Governments enforce the dependence of a growing number of complacent citizens at the expense of their most productive.
1
4
1,207
Can you explain? Who depends on who?
4
1,297
Replying to @levelsio
I’m a fan but this take is completely out of touch. Everyone will not be a nomad. do you eat food? Who farms your food? How will they be nomads? Now think through every single capital and land intensive operation in the world you depend on. Delusional take. People want roots
1
1
3
298
If you still think your food is grown by humans, you're mistaken, it's mostly automated!
1
612
Replying to @levelsio
Do you project childlessness upon everyone ?
1
4
665
No you can just travel with kids
2
4
853
Replying to @levelsio
Systems carry a lot of inertia, and resist change. They will reorganize their internal structure to adapt to enviromental changes, until they can't any longer. Too big of a change breaks the systems in a very non-linear way. Bifurcations I think they call them. I think now we are living through the end of the lifecycle of systems that were established after WWII. I don't know what will be the thing that break those (war, AI, macroeconomic factors, space exploration, or all of these all at once), but I think its very hard to imagine the forms of governance that will emerge. Theoretically, with blockchain and AI we can have self-organization of bigger groups of people, that is for the first time in history not tied to land, kina the Balaji /decentralist school of thought. The primary inputs to grow a population are the capacity to produce (and consume) energy and food. And to do that one must be able to defend those resources from other populations that would claim them. The latter is still a question for me: What will dictate the monopoly of violence within a provence and what will define the equilibrium between the different provences? A mega-powerful robot-army monarch, a bunch of smaller techno-decentralist communities, or something we lack the imagination to describe?
1
4
491
I think you're right Politics and democracies don't function anymore so we need a new system
2
5
579
Replying to @levelsio
Owning land will become more and more relevant. Are you buying now?
1
4
829
Yes I own land on multiple continents now
2
11
1,024
Replying to @levelsio
What are your thoughts on @ns and @balajis ?
1
2
871
Yes that's part of it, it's all built on this
2
11
1,185
Replying to @levelsio
How do poor or middle class people afford personal security if not from the state? It's super expensive to have body guards.
2
847
We used to be able to fight Also arms!
2
3
982