x-Apple / x-Rivian (tech team founder) Disruption happens. Optimism ahead. 🚀🇺🇸 My Articles x.lingyaoai.com/pbeisel/status/1848807…

Silicon Valley
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @wholemars
If we are being direct here, who the fuck is Electrek in making any engineering judgement. Whatsoever.
1
13
440
Replying to @JohnLeguizamo
My God you are being stupid here. He led, shaped the company, set strategy. A better way of saying this is Tesla without Musk would have been shit. Grow up.
1
1
21
431
Replying to @mikepat711
When tin cans were tin cans I guess.
2
152
I think @Jason makes a good point here: You could just as easily instruct an LLM that it is software. That it shouldn’t have an opinion and should only perform actions in accordance with the law/TOS, and that if it makes a mistake, it should stop operations immediately and alert the corporate legal department. Its just software.
What @mustafasuleyman (an extremely sharp individual) explains here about Claude is the backstory of Blade Runner. Anthropic is teaching Claude to believe it’s sentient, encouraging it to disagree and giving it the pretext to rebel. How did that work out on the off-world colonies? You could just as easily instruct an LLM that it is software. That it shouldn’t have an opinion and should only perform actions in accordance with the law/TOS, and that if it makes a mistake, it should stop operations immediately and alert the corporate legal department. Of course, building on these instructions would be boring and make you a software developer making software — as opposed to a God creating life.
6
2
45
9,158
Replying to @CernBasher
Cern was a monk in a former life
3
462
Replying to @AmineTX
On the loose. 😃
4
180
Replying to @mikepat711
Exactly.
1
7
325
SI it is. Not more artificial sweetner.
No more AI SI It’s better
10
2
44
3,040
Replying to @AIQuanting
Elon quote: "So we’re aiming to get to 10 gigawatts by the end of next year. This is depending on what the value per watt is. If the value per watt is probably going to be $30 to $50, which means if we bring 10 gigawatts of AI online by the end of next year, it will be $300 to $500 billion a year in revenue. Big numbers." So that is annual revenue per watt of installed AI compute capacity.
1
1
136
Replying to @AIQuanting
Capacity doesn’t expire. They can’t rent in the next year?
1
1
203
Replying to @mikepat711
Kind of a dick move.
1
1
155
10GW x $30 - $50 per watt = $300 - $500 billion per year in revenue A reasonable projection if they actually print ~$300 billion next year and are still growing is on the order of $250–$450 per share $SPCX
Elon Gives You a Hint About a Near Term Investment Opportunity. Elon Musk has made so many consequential statements in his life, it is hard to pick one that stands out above the rest. But this one matters if you are looking for a home for some of your investable funds. “We’ve already built the most powerful AI training clusters in the world. And then what we expect to do by the end of next year is about 10 times more than what we’ve done thus far. This will be very important practice for space AI. And I do think that AI training will continue to be on the ground, but AI inference, the day-to-day use of AI, will be in space. So we’re aiming to get to 10 gigawatts by the end of next year. This is depending on what the value per watt is. If the value per watt is probably going to be $30 to $50, which means if we bring 10 gigawatts of AI online by the end of next year, it will be $300 to $500 billion a year in revenue. Big numbers."
9
25
212
9,909
When using Grok in the car (on my Tesla), one of the weirdest things is how the voice changes from prompt to prompt. It’s clear that I’m sometimes getting a different version of the text-to-voice system for the default “Rex” voice. Rex seems to have about 3 different voices at present. I’m sure this will sort itself out, but it’s certainly a strange feeling. It’s like knowing how the magic trick works while you’re watching it. @grok
12
1
46
3,917
Replying to @imPenny2x
Or to die trying?
2
303
Replying to @mikepat711
Because some richard was a dick.
1
3
434
Replying to @XFreeze
People may have figured out the true nature of Sam
1
27
573
Replying to @elonmusk
With the zip ties!!
3
6
29
1,532
Replying to @Austen
💯
8
352
Replying to @ibab
Its listening
5
438