DarkHorse. Prof in Exile. Trade-Offs. Telomeres, senescence & cancer. Reluctant Radical. Game~B, Brownstone Fellow. Emojis imply irony. Opinions, not my own đŸ€”

Washington State, USA
It is criminal that our government enabled a bat virus to infect and spread between humans. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a bigger betrayal of our species. It is equally troubling that the mad scientists who did this then gaslit all the people of the world about it, including those who CORRECTLY interpreted the evidence. Then, of course, the very same monsters amped up fear of the Covid frankenvirus and steered the panicked public away from safe medicines, and toward an obviously dangerous gene-therapy which they falsely called a vaccine in order to lure us into acceptance. These are among the greatest crimes EVER committed against humanity. We now have persuasive evidence of everything I have said above. If we don't correct the record and hold the perpetrators to account, this pattern will happen again, and again, and again--shortening our life expectancy, and degrading our quality of life each time that it does. This is our Nuremberg moment. We can not simply move on from this ghastly chapter of history. We must finish it. @brownstoneinst
Replying to @RandPaul
@RandPaul DOCS: hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/
 "SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."
1,021
9,796
28,243
1,083,873
European collapse was predictable in 2018 with @DouglasKMurray’s Strange Death of Europe, but the alarm didn’t ring because the architects painted Murray’s perspective as “far right.” The same trick obscures other truths with “antivaxer,” “conspiracy theorist” and “antisemitic.”
At first, Jean-Pierre did not understand. He watched the evening news, paid his taxes, voted responsibly and believed what respectable people told him. 1. France needed immigration because the economy needed workers. 2. Diversity was an opportunity. 3. Public services were under pressure because they lacked funding. 4. Disorder at school was caused by inequality. 5. Crime statistics required context. 6. Anyone who connected these things too quickly was probably an extremist. Then his children started coming home from school saying they could barely hear the teacher. Half the lesson was spent restoring order. Teachers changed constantly. Some simply disappeared for weeks. Jean-Pierre complained once, politely. The administration explained that the situation was “challenging” and that the school was developing an “inclusive pedagogical response.” Jean-Pierre went home reassured. There were professionals dealing with it. His neighbourhood changed too. Shops closed. Others appeared. Groups of men occupied the same corners every evening. His wife stopped taking one street after dark. Jean-Pierre noticed all of this, but he had also learned that noticing patterns was dangerous. So every event remained an isolated event. One closed shop meant nothing. One assault meant nothing. Ten incidents meant ten unrelated incidents. Only a racist would connect dots. Then his daughter was sexually assaulted by a man who had recently arrived in France. Jean-Pierre was devastated. But almost immediately he began policing his own thoughts. The attacker was an individual. Of course. One must never generalise. The television explained that exploiting such crimes politically was irresponsible. A minister warned against “stigmatisation.” Jean-Pierre found himself nodding through tears. What had happened to his daughter was monstrous, but the truly frightening possibility, apparently, was that somebody somewhere might vote for the wrong party because of it. Nothing changed. His son’s school became worse. His daughter stopped going out alone. His wife wanted to move. The police were exhausted. The teachers were exhausted. The hospitals were exhausted. Jean-Pierre was exhausted. Yet every explanation he had been given required him to believe that each deterioration was temporary, accidental, exaggerated or caused by something entirely unrelated to the deterioration immediately beside it. And whenever somebody proposed that perhaps the country had made serious mistakes — about migration, authority, education, policing, integration, punishment or borders — Jean-Pierre knew the correct answer. “Careful. That sounds like the far right.” So he remained reasonable. He remained moderate. He remained informed. He remained completely incapable of drawing a conclusion from his own life. So at first, Jean-Pierre did not understand. And he still does not understand.
102
615
4,402
97,778
Bret Weinstein retweeted
Mass migration turned subsistence farmers in the Darién Gap into a boom economy. When it ended, they were left with nothing. Bret Weinstein argues the people behind that policy see ordinary Americans the same way, and that AI could do the same thing to all of us. "Frankly, wake up, folks. This is what the control grid they're building is for. They're not planning to take care of us. They're planning to keep us from noticing that we've been betrayed and doing anything about it. That's it."
8
42
272
19,636
Every time an execution is botched I think the same thing: if we can humanely euthanize pets, then the state could also do it to condemned people. The somewhat regular failure to execute convicts without torturing them is evidence of some darker intent.
740
238
4,334
164,854
Bret Weinstein retweeted
Now you can read what injection-injured people (and surviving relations) wrote in their V-safe entries. This is intensely powerful material. People not just statistics. 400 pages. Thank you @React19org for putting this together and trusting @brownstoneinst with the release. Please read and share. @SenRonJohnson brownstone.org/articles/crie

120
1,958
3,547
145,599
You should all watch this. @_jburden is a very deep thinker, and we had an excellent conversation.
In today's episode with @BretWeinstein, we discuss identity politics, Generation Z, and the war between the sexes. Out on audio now; the video version drops at 12pm
35
47
632
45,575
Exploring the drone hypothesis with @I_Am_JohnCullen. *Cullen has revised the hypothesis based on further ballistic analysis since we recorded this conversation. 00:00:00 Can You Trust a Man With a Pen Name? 00:01:39 Tyler Robinson, Acting Alone? 00:03:42 Sponsor: Lovebird Cereal 00:05:33 Why John Cullen Is Irrelevant 00:22:10 Sponsor: Mars Men 00:23:07 A Pentagon Spy Plane at UVU 00:32:24 Back 25 Minutes After the Shot 00:57:31 The Drones Nobody Wants to Explain 01:10:42 Bird of Prey: A Rifle That Flies 01:17:55 The Round Left on the Roof 01:37:34 Why Was There No Exit Wound? 01:43:27 Butler and the Spiral of Silence 01:50:42 Wouldn't Someone Have Seen It? 01:59:37 Las Vegas: No Shots From the Window 02:05:31 Was the Real Target MBS? 02:19:47 Three Women, a Minivan, 24 Guns 02:27:35 Flushing Out the Crown Prince 02:39:46 Who Broke the Window? 02:47:01 The Deadliest Gunman in History?
144
172
940
168,765
Bret Weinstein retweeted
Bret Weinstein says the Epstein files were a bait and switch. The dump was not what people were asking for. He says the Epstein files were not Jeffrey Epstein’s emails. According to Bran, they should have been the FBI’s file on the case. What they found. What they concluded. Why they didn’t search Zorro Ranch. "They gave us a huge amount of stuff, hard to look away from, but it is not what we were talking about." "We still don't know what Epstein was. We don't know why he was handled the way he was."
54
255
1,242
59,211
This week on the evolutionary lens, we bring you new cats, fat bears, and overwhelmed frogs. x.lingyaoai.com/i/broadcasts/1PKqrNkEY

18
6
88
35,419
Bret Weinstein retweeted
If the camera can lie in real time, the tape is no longer evidence. Bret Weinstein told Julian Dorey a firm called Toka is pitching access to internet-connected CCTV, shut it down, rewrite the feed, no fingerprint the owner can see. Maybe the brochure is smoke. The product category is the problem. A court that treats video as a witness just inherited a witness that can be owned. Convict the innocent. Clear the guilty. Call it safety. When power can edit the street, jurisprudence is a costume.
20
197
701
49,086
Bret Weinstein retweeted
Bret Weinstein says Covid uncovered “how the machine actually works.” “It’s very dark
 ” “I feel like I went to Covid University.” “I got a graduate degree in criminality, in fraud.” “I learned all about the way the world actually apparently works
 once I had been sort of evicted from polite society.” “The worst thing about this is that it’s not implausible.” “It’s on the list of possibilities and it’s very dark.” @BretWeinstein @Polyface_Farms
34
286
978
30,860
Bret Weinstein retweeted
An intelligent thesis that would explain almost everything that makes your blood boil.
Replying to @BretWeinstein
Thesis: 1. A powerful force (PF) acts with impunity inside the U.S. (examples: JFK, RFK, MLK, 9/11, Las Vegas, Covid, J6, Butler, CK) 2. Official investigations (conducted by captured agencies) actively avoid revealing the PF. 3. Cover stories for crimes committed by the PF are reflexively validated and become mainstream narratives. 4. Domain experts are intimidated and punished by the PF for exploring anomalies in official narratives. 5. Domain experts who do respond to these social threats end up fooling themselves in order to resolve their cognitive dissonance, rationalizing official explanations and "debunking" credible hypotheses about the activity of the PF. 6. Dissident, non-conforming experts are ridiculed, leaving them socially and professionally outcast. 7. Because the social and career costs are extreme for those who question official narratives, a market for sophistry emerges--Experts and laypeople alike seek to rationalize their own complacency against the PF.
40
113
1,513
144,591
Bret Weinstein retweeted
Thank you for (finally) addressing my actual argument, @michaelshermer. Unfortunately, your response is more like an example of my thesis (advancing fallacious arguments to resolve cognitive dissonance) than it is a refutation of any premise. I proposed the existence of a powerful force (PF) that appears to act with impunity within the U.S. You demand that I name names, and you suggest I would be laughed out of the Grand Jury chamber if I refused. What a strange leap. I’m making a logical argument for seeking to identify perpetrators. You want to impose a legal standard from the stage when *the state* has not only identified suspects, but believes it has a strong enough case to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. You’re a smart man. You know that doesn’t make sense. Many crimes are evident before perpetrators can be identified, let alone prosecuted. That’s why we have investigations. Obviously.
65
37
703
53,305
This presentation is pivotal, but not in a good way. It would appear the fix is in. Dissident doctors, scientists and journalists pulled the curtain all the way back during Covid, each at spectacular personal cost. Meanwhile, those in power destroyed their credibility. It would be natural for the dissidents to lead any true Covid investigation. But power has other plans. If power is to survive an exploration of the Covid catastrophe, it must prevent the vindication of the dissidents. Instead power will promote its friends to scold them *and* the dissidents equally, so we can have an empty catharsis and get back to business as usual—without any meaningful change. This is the process that ensures no one is held accountable. I call it the Middle Ground Scramble. The important slide is at 25:00. Make no mistake, #Drastic is there only to give the slide gravitas. Your new heroines are nominated at the top of the screen. They are the rocks. And Bill Gurley, it seems, is the Siren.
All-In Summit: Bill Gurley (0:00) Bill Gurley takes the stage at the All-In Summit (1:29) Bill's Presentation: Searching for Feynman Links to additional resources mentioned in talk and used in research: p3.institute/searching_for_f
 @bgurley
77
242
1,446
204,603
Bret Weinstein retweeted
Thesis: 1. A powerful force (PF) acts with impunity inside the U.S. (examples: JFK, RFK, MLK, 9/11, Las Vegas, Covid, J6, Butler, CK) 2. Official investigations (conducted by captured agencies) actively avoid revealing the PF. 3. Cover stories for crimes committed by the PF are reflexively validated and become mainstream narratives. 4. Domain experts are intimidated and punished by the PF for exploring anomalies in official narratives. 5. Domain experts who do respond to these social threats end up fooling themselves in order to resolve their cognitive dissonance, rationalizing official explanations and "debunking" credible hypotheses about the activity of the PF. 6. Dissident, non-conforming experts are ridiculed, leaving them socially and professionally outcast. 7. Because the social and career costs are extreme for those who question official narratives, a market for sophistry emerges--Experts and laypeople alike seek to rationalize their own complacency against the PF.
368
941
5,613
587,535
You seem unwilling to make eye contact with my thesis about domain experts, @michaelshermer. Why is that? I'll put it in the first reply.
Yes @BretWeinstein just asking questions is what scientists should do, but at some point when your questions have been answered endlessly for years it is time to move on (WTC #7? Really? It burned all day). Question: how do you think controlled demolition workers got into the WTC buildings, spent weeks breaking through dry wall to plant explosive devices, at the exact angled floors the planes subsequently hit (how did they know?!), WITHOUT ANYONE NOTICING?!
64
52
917
148,125
Thesis: 1. A powerful force (PF) acts with impunity inside the U.S. (examples: JFK, RFK, MLK, 9/11, Las Vegas, Covid, J6, Butler, CK) 2. Official investigations (conducted by captured agencies) actively avoid revealing the PF. 3. Cover stories for crimes committed by the PF are reflexively validated and become mainstream narratives. 4. Domain experts are intimidated and punished by the PF for exploring anomalies in official narratives. 5. Domain experts who do respond to these social threats end up fooling themselves in order to resolve their cognitive dissonance, rationalizing official explanations and "debunking" credible hypotheses about the activity of the PF. 6. Dissident, non-conforming experts are ridiculed, leaving them socially and professionally outcast. 7. Because the social and career costs are extreme for those who question official narratives, a market for sophistry emerges--Experts and laypeople alike seek to rationalize their own complacency against the PF.
368
941
5,613
587,535
Bret Weinstein retweeted
just dropped an episode w/ @BretWeinstein. i would list off everything we covered, but there's not enough room in this tweet. great convo!
71
105
1,164
38,039
We're going to talk about how to do science when the accusations start flying using pets as super cool examples. x.lingyaoai.com/i/broadcasts/1aKbdEmwM

24
11
115
39,794