"An Inconvenient Study" has reached an estimated 140 million global views and won 17 festival awards. The Henry Ford vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated birth cohort study at its center is now being cited by doctors and researchers around the world, many of whom have never heard of ICAN or The HighWire.
@NicHulscher testified before a Michigan legislative committee after Representative Brad Paquette, who found him on X, invited him to debate the Henry Ford Health researchers directly on their own unpublished data. Henry Ford Health was scheduled to appear. They did not show up.
Hulscher walked the committee through the findings: vaccinated children showed a 2.5 times higher risk of developing a chronic disease compared to unvaccinated children after full statistical modeling. At the ten-year mark, 57% of vaccinated children had at least one chronic disease, compared to 17% of unvaccinated children.
His peer-reviewed reanalysis, published with Dr. Peter McCullough and John Leake on their Substack at
focalpoints.com, stripped away the statistical adjustments Henry Ford applied and looked at raw proportions across all 22 chronic disease categories.
Every single one was higher in the vaccinated group. No exceptions. ADHD and diabetes appeared only in the vaccinated group. Cancer was 54% higher in vaccinated children. Autism was higher in the vaccinated children. Twelve other vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies across the world show the same pattern: whenever there is an unvaccinated control group, vaccinated children are sicker across most health domains.
The transcript from An Inconvenient Study, showing lead researcher Dr. Marcus Zervos on camera saying the study is good and that he would not publish it because he does not want to suffer what McCullough did, was played at the hearing. Henry Ford did not send anyone to respond.