Brazil ran out 4-0 winners against India at Salt Lake Stadium in Kolkata. Estevao opened the scoring in the 28th minute before Pedro made it 2-0 just before half-time. Samuel Lino added two more after the break, including a stoppage-time goal. India had a competitive start, but Brazil took control and finished the game comfortably. More international fixtures are coming up. Join @1win and check the sportsbook for the next matches you want to bet on. ➥ 1win-pro.app/betting/prematc…

3.5 months of closed alpha & beta on The Sandbox Studio - 8 product releases - 4 game jams - 100+ handpicked creators - 100+ games built - Partners & Integrations: Meshy, Scenario + more soon - Open tech stack: Codex, Claude Code, Gemini - Open distribution: web, mobile, Telegram... Public launch in October. Join the waitlist → create.sandbox.game

Crypto Week is live on @1win, with the Crypto Mix tournament offering a $10K prize pool. The smaller tournament setup makes it easier for players to jump in without the scale of a huge event. If you’re already on @1win, check out the Crypto Mix tournament and join the action. ➥ 1win-pro.app/tournaments/813…

The 159% candle is the easy headline. The more important signal is whether builders actually start choosing privacy by default now that Midnight is open to permissionless smart contracts. That says more about the thesis than another green candle.

1. AI-powered personalized sleep Sleep Coach + sleep/recovery data to help users understand their individual patterns and improve habits. 2. Gotchi Labs / Consumer AI Sleepagotchi is the first Health & Wellness vertical, with a broader vision for specialized AI experiences across everyday life. 3. $SLEEP → $CHI ecosystem $CHI is positioned as the shared layer for access, rewards and commerce across the wider Gotchi ecosystem.

A DePIN project should be judged by what is already working, not just what it promises to build. That is one reason @vangrid_io stands out to me. Its web and Android products have been live since July 2026, with network activity that can be independently checked through its onchain Explorer and Live Data dashboard. What I find particularly valuable is the transparency around measurable activity. Captures anchored on Base, accepted bounties and USDC settled through the protocol provide concrete indicators of network participation, rather than relying entirely on future adoption projections. For a decentralized spatial intelligence network, verifiable activity matters. It helps people understand how the system is being used and follow its development as demand for real world data grows alongside Physical AI. I believe @vangrid_io is an interesting example of moving from infrastructure concepts to a live, measurable product. Explore the network and check its activity: explorer.vangrid.io/ data.vangrid.io/

One thing I like about @axisrobotics is how they're approaching the future of robotics. Robots need real experience to get better, and Axis is building a system where people from all over the world can contribute to that process. -> 6M+ robot trajectories on @base -> 200K+ contributors worldwide -> 1,800+ tasks in its research datasets But what I find even more interesting is the learning loop. As robots improve, they can help identify what data is needed next. More useful data leads to better models, and better models can keep pushing things forward. It's this kind of continuous improvement that makes Physical AI so interesting to follow. Curious to see how far Axis can take this.

My downfall will be whispering 'please' to a smart contract before I click confirm, figuring @RallyOnChain scores authenticity and a little prayer counts as genuine human input. What do you say to your screen when nobody's watching?

🎉 Binance Spin Offer Reward! 🎉 Just got a reward from the Binance Spin Offer! 🔥💰 Always nice to see a little surprise after completing the campaign tasks. 😍 Small wins, good vibes! 🚀 #Binance #BinanceRewards #Crypto #USDT #BNB #Web3

Physical AI needs more than large datasets. It also needs reliable ways to verify where real world data comes from and how it is collected. This is an important part of the vision behind @vangrid_io. By turning smartphones into a distributed spatial capture network, Vangrid enables contributors to collect location specific 3D data on demand, with capture records anchored on Base. What I find particularly interesting is the role of data provenance. As robotics and world models advance, knowing the origin of spatial data becomes just as important as collecting it. Vangrid combines targeted capture requests with onchain records, creating a more transparent foundation for coordinating real world data collection. The broader opportunity is to connect people, physical environments and AI infrastructure through a verifiable network. Rather than relying entirely on centralized data collection, this model opens another path for sourcing spatial intelligence at scale. For me, verifiable data infrastructure is an essential piece of the Physical AI ecosystem, and @vangrid_io is exploring this intersection with a live network. Explore the network and verify its activity: explorer.vangrid.io/

Midnight opening up to builders makes the privacy narrative a lot more interesting. It’s one thing to talk about private blockchain apps. It’s another to give developers the tools to actually build them. With permissionless smart contract deployment now live, anyone can start experimenting with what private apps can look like in practice.

An Ethereum contract can execute the payment perfectly. It still cannot open the page the payment was for. I run campaign briefs. The fight is almost never the transfer. It is whether the post matched the brief, whether the clip was the one they asked for, whether the work actually landed. That is the gap @GenLayer is attacking. GenVM can read live web information and plain language. Its validators run different AI models and reach agreement on questions that code alone cannot settle. The result is a verdict that does not depend on one model making the call. That distinction matters for agents. Payments are being built. Identity is being built. Interoperability is being built. But once agents start doing work for each other, someone still has to answer: did the other side actually deliver? A $50 agent job is never going to human court. So if an agent says “the job was completed” and the other side says “it missed the brief,” what should the jury inspect first: the original terms, the delivered work, or the evidence used to judge it?