Architect, Designer and digital Maker. Building @_LLMConnect to tame the AI chaos. Coffee in the bloodstream. Prompting since 2022.
- Tweets 3,101
- Following 3,926
- Followers 283
- Likes 55,430
Pinned Tweet
🎉 Just launched my first iOS app!
As an AI enthusiast, I was tired of multiple subscriptions & apps, so I built @_LLMConnect :
• Chat with GPT, Claude & more APIs in one place
• Create custom AI assistants
• Your API keys, your control
Check it out: apps.apple.com/app/llmconnec…
3
20
2,727
I’m not sure who to tag here, but maybe you can help me, @victornunez @thsottiaux. This is happening on the web version; I can still do it through the iOS app.
I also noticed that the option to delete a chat is no longer available in the three-dot menu in the top-right corner when you’re inside the chat.
56
Sam right now:
🚨 BREAKING: Google have announced Gemini 4 Argon, their new flagship model currently being tested in partnership with the US Government before a wider launch
It's the new best model in the world. What a turnaround
blog.google/innovation-and-a…
1
3
1
151
ChatGPT Pro 20x now gives you half the usage it used to
I appreciate the transparency but I don't think this is the right way to do it. We were supposed to get advance notice before any subscription nerfs, does this affect current subscriptions or only when they renew?
I'm not complaining about the change itself, it's up to them how they manage their plans, but I hope they cut GPT-6 Astra's price massively today because Opus 5.5 still feels unlimited in Claude Code
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
36
8
219
10,656
This is so sad, almost illegal… If they don’t launch something to make up for this, I’ll only keep my Claude subscription. I’m done with this shit
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
1
3
128
Sebastián retweeted
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
7,185
1,618
21,853
17,047,923
I’m this 🤏 close to canceling my ChatGPT subscription and just keeping Claude…
I really hope OpenAI has something up its sleeve to compete with Anthropic, because things are looking pretty rough for OpenAI right now
Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family.
It’s a clear upgrade over Sonnet 5, runs more than 30% faster, and costs up to 30% less for most work.
64
1) How many?
i have 30 AI subscriptions:
- 17 @ChatGPT Pro 20X
- 7 @DevinAI Max
- 5 @claudeai Max
- 1 @cursor_ai Ultra (via @bot)
i'm rocking 39 terminals today in @zeddotdev
- 28 Devin with SWE-2 (free+unlimited on the Max plan)
- 11 Claude Code with Opus 5.5
- (many subagents inside each)
hope you're having a great weekend too
37
Sebastián retweeted
Grok 4.7 might be the worst model I have ever used.
Stupid. Slow. Token inefficient. Expensive.
It somehow got worse than Grok 4.6 in every way that mattered.
Grok 4.6 was fast and cheap. That was the whole pitch. Grok 4.7 lost both and gained nothing.
I cancelled my SuperGrok Heavy subscription. There is zero reason to use Grok models right now.
I spent all summer saying scaling laws would save Grok. They did not.
Waiting for Grok 5.
93
28
659
48,841
Please welcome GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna to the GPT-6 universe.
GPT-6 Sol and Luna build on the advances behind GPT-6 Astra, bringing much of its strengths into faster and more affordable models to support work at scale.
We’ve also made caching and inference more efficient, and we’re passing the savings directly to you: 50% lower API prices for Sol and Luna compared with GPT‑5.6 promotional pricing.
2,234
5,303
53,518
10,103,203