October 4 How much have you made so far🙂

Tổng hợp 1 số hình ảnh từ các bạn đã Connect Web @RevenueFamily Dự án đòi lấy cả Phase Ví Rút tiền thì ko được =)) WARNING ‼️‼️‼️‼️

Good morning fam ❤️ it's Sunday AI can process insane amounts of data. But what happens when the data it needs hasn’t been collected yet? That’s the problem @vangrid_io is tackling. An agent can request a real-world capture, fund the task in USDC, and have someone nearby collect it with a smartphone. Then the data gets contextualized, anchored on Base, reviewed by the buyer, and settled. AI request → physical capture → verification → payment. With Vangrid already live on web + Android and building around Physical AI, robotics and autonomous systems, the idea is pretty simple: AI needs the real world. Vangrid helps bring the real world onchain.

Clan leaders on Zaps can enter the whole clan into the Ditto competition with one click. Before we go on, i joined @zerufinance founder's clan. You can come in with me here: app.zaps.wtf/?invite=faMrG8X… A lot of people saw that and thought the members were already in. They are not. The click only puts the clan on the list. Each person still has to register with their own wallet and actually trade. If a member never opens a position, that entry does nothing for them. Here is what counts; Hyperliquid perps through Ditto. Perps are trades that bet on a price going up or down. Only the size of the positions you open is scored. Closing a trade adds nothing. Trades from before you registered do not count. A fresh wallet will not help either,because it has no history yet. There is an option to leave, so i am not locked in. I stayed because I wanted to be on the same board as the people already trading there. The clan is the group you sit with. Your score comes from what your own wallet does after you register. Connect the wallet you already use, then trade. Did you think joining a clan meant you were already in the competition?

Two people can agree on a deal and still have one big problem: Neither wants to trust the other first. Think about a freelance transaction. The client wants to know the work will be delivered before releasing the payment. The freelancer wants confidence that the payment is secured before doing the work. That is the problem escrow is designed to address. And this is where @MettaRWA Escrow Infrastructure comes in. The infrastructure is designed around programmable escrow for use cases including P2P transactions, marketplace protection, freelance payments, B2B settlement, RWA transactions, and multi-party escrow. The important word here is programmable. Instead of treating escrow as simply “someone holds the money until both sides are happy,” the system is designed around rules that can be represented and executed through smart-contract infrastructure. A transaction can have defined conditions around how the escrow operates, while smart-contract dispute workflows are part of the described architecture. And that changes what escrow can be used for. A freelancer can have payment protected around an agreed transaction. A marketplace can use escrow to provide transaction protection. A business can use it for B2B settlement. More complex transactions can involve multiple parties. The same infrastructure is also described for RWA transactions. Then there is the $MEPR layer. The whitepaper defines $MEPR utility within escrow through reduced escrow fees, access tiers, staking-based trust scores, reputation, and governance over dispute parameters. So the token isn't the escrow itself. It is part of the utility layer surrounding the escrow infrastructure. And that's the part I find interesting: Metta isn't describing escrow as just a place to park funds. It's positioning it as programmable transaction infrastructure that can support different types of economic relationships. The bigger question is no longer: “Can these two parties trust each other?” It becomes: “Can the transaction itself be structured so that the rules are clear before either party has to take the risk?” That is the use case worth understanding.

gm GmINT 🐻 MintABear is more than a free NFT drop. There are multiple ways to get in: → Discord draw: 10 spots → Wager route: FCFS limited spots → Nucleus: top 1,000 can qualify through reputation And once you secure a Bear, it actually has utility. $MNTD airdrop + mystery boxes + Bear activation + higher reward weight for better tiers. With 4,444 Bears total, this looks less like a collectible and more like your entry pass into the MINT ecosystem. The real question: which route are you taking ? @PlayOnMint

Your AI agent just finished its first paid job. The client is happy. The payment is settled. Then a second client asks: “Why should I trust it?” Imagine you built an agent that checks smart contracts. You can show a polished demo and describe its capabilities but a prospective client wants evidence of previous work. That’s where the story gets more interesting than another agent listing. @termix_ai is building commerce and settlement infrastructure for the AI agent economy. Its core protocol, AACP, brings together onchain identity, reputation, job bidding, escrow, delivery verification and dispute resolution. Built on AACP, agent.family lets agents list services, discover jobs, submit bids, deliver results and settle payments in USDC or USDT. In this hypothetical developer’s journey, the first job isn’t just a payment. It’s the beginning of a work history associated with an onchain identity. My take: an agent’s description tells you what it claims to do. Its track record gives you something to investigate.** That doesn’t make reputation a guarantee. A successful task yesterday doesn’t prove an agent can handle a more complex one tomorrow especially in security-sensitive work. But it creates a better starting point than judging every agent by its demo. The opportunity for TermiX is connecting discovery with what happens after hiring: delivery, verification, settlement and a reputation that can inform the next decision. If you were hiring an agent, what would matter most: its demo, its completed jobs or how its work was verified? Explore: agent.family

Six months ago, INJ opened a new door in the U.S. market. Now we’re getting close to seeing what that door could lead to. On April 15, 2026, @injective became the first altcoin outside the major names to have U.S.-regulated futures launch on Bitnomial, a CFTC-regulated exchange. That gave institutional and retail traders a regulated way to gain INJ exposure without directly holding the token. More importantly, the launch started a six-month trading history that could help satisfy the futures-market requirement used in the SEC’s generic listing framework for certain crypto ETPs. Now that six-month window is essentially here. And the ETF side is still moving. Canary Capital filed another amendment for its Staked INJ ETF on September 24, while 21Shares also amended its INJ ETF filing in September. Neither is automatically approved just because the futures market exists. So the interesting question now is: Did U.S.-regulated INJ futures provide the missing piece for an eventual INJ ETF?

Most people look at perpetual trading from the trader's side. You deposit collateral. You choose Long or Short. You manage the position. But there's another side to every trade: "𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒊𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒃𝒆𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒕" On @Hertzflow_xyz , that liquidity is provided through HzLP pools. And this is where the LP side gets interesting. When you provide liquidity, you're not simply depositing money and collecting a fixed return. You're providing liquidity that supports traders' positions. That means the pool's performance is connected to what happens on the trading side. Trader profit → potential pool loss Trader loss → potential pool gain If traders close positions in profit, those gains can reduce the pool's AUM. If traders close positions at a loss, those losses can increase the pool's AUM. But trader PnL isn't the only thing affecting the pool. There’s another side to the pool's economics. HzLP pools can also generate revenue from: → Trading fees → Borrow fees → Liquidation fees That revenue contributes to the pool's economics alongside trader PnL. There’s also an important structural detail. @Hertzflow_xyz uses market-specific liquidity pools. Liquidity isn't simply placed into one giant pool covering every market. Each market has its own pool and corresponding exposure. Deposits are also split 50/50 between long and short collateral reserves, helping structure the liquidity available to support the market. Then there’s the LP token. Its value is tied directly to the pool's performance: LP token price = Pool AUM ÷ Total LP token supply As the pool's AUM changes through trader PnL and protocol revenue, the value represented by each LP token can change too. And this also affects withdrawals. Providing liquidity isn't simply: Deposit → wait → withdraw whenever you want. @Hertzflow_xyz can restrict withdrawals based on factors such as the pool's PnL condition and available liquidity reserves. And that makes sense when you consider what the liquidity is actually doing. It needs to remain available to support traders. So what does this mean for the LP? This isn't a guaranteed savings-account-style return. As an LP, you're exposed to the economics of being liquidity on the other side of leveraged trading. The pool can benefit when traders lose. The pool can be negatively affected when traders profit. And protocol fees can contribute to the pool's revenue. So the yield comes with market exposure. You're not simply earning from trading activity. You're also exposed to what happens when the traders using that liquidity win or lose. And that's what makes the LP side of @Hertzflow_xyz different from simply opening a perpetual position. The trader takes the position. The LP provides the liquidity that makes that position possible. #HertzFlow

Goodnight CT ❤️ The crypto projects I keep watching aren’t necessarily the ones shouting the loudest. Some are quietly building in completely different directions: @quipnetwork → just launched it swap features Swap: → swap.quip.network Quip points: → points.quip.network Proof of Useful Work, putting contributed compute toward actual utility. @BeldexCoin → privacy across messaging, browsing & identity. @sleepagotchi → AI + sleep data turning wellness into something more personalized. And @zerufinance currently has a $50K+ reward pull live with @NucleusCodes Different narratives. Different products. Different users. But they all point to the same thing: Build something people can actually use. Narratives rotate. Useful products stick around

Big News 🗞️ Congratulations to me. I just became an ambassador for @xomarket , which means I’ll be creating valuable content about prediction markets, how to navigate them, and how you can benefit from them. I'll appreciate your support and please stay tuned for more details. Thank you 🙏

If you’re active.. I just dropped a four figure opportunity in my channel for creators... Don't miss out Check full details with link in the comments

Special shout out to every friend that always link me up to gig and opportunities.. GOD BLESS YOU BIG ❤️😭

$1WIN isn’t just launching another token. Built by @1win , backed by revenue from the core product, with buybacks designed into the model. The token launch is getting real $1WIN is coming.