MAGA•PATRIOT•MOM 🇺🇸 Catholic. Heritage American. Disability Advocate. Info Horder. Optimistic Fueled by love, creativity & caffeine. NO DM’s
Florida, USA
Based in United States
- Tweets 69,643
- Following 4,602
- Followers 7,625
- Likes 166,333
Omg! What a Sunday BLESSING!! You just put A HUGE SMILE on my daughter’s face this morning! And being that she’s “all teen” that’s a mighty big deal! 😉
From the both of us THANK YOU 🙏🏽
5
993
NEW ERA OF ENLIGHTENMENT: Where Jean-Jacques Rousseau once wrote “let them eat brioche” the French have immigrated there new enlightenment era to “let them feast on fire”
1
1
2
174
Yeah… because the books that give us the 10 Commandments & the Beatitude’s are a “real safety issue” for a CIVIL SOCIETY
1
5
62
1,796
RAPID FAMILIA DNA TESTING of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, WAS CANCELLED…on purpose‼️
This program, used by @CBP, to confirm familial relationships & detect trafficking
Democrats, were the Pimps and the Cartel’s were the Body Mules that aided in the facilitation of CHILD TRAFFICKING — Under the Biden/Harris administration, the contract for rapid FAMILIA DNA TESTING of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, WAS ENDED‼️ This program, used by @CBP, to confirm familial relationships & detect trafficking.
ADD TO THAT the “relaxing” or out right elimination of procedures used to protect children, by the then HHS Leadership, ALL THANKS TO the current CA Governor candidate @XavierBecerra.
• March 22, 2021, ORR directive explicitly limited DNA use to establishing biological relationships for sponsorship and stated that submission by the parent/sponsor was voluntary.
• March 31, 2021, background check requirements for certain adult household members and alternate caregivers were eased or made non-mandatory for some sponsor categories to facilitate faster releases amid high volumes of arrivals.
• DNA was used “on occasion” as one of multiple tools, according to Becerra’s testimony. It was NOT a routine or mandatory rapid-testing requirement for most cases.
• Sponsor vetting was loosened via a 2021 HHS-DHS Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that reduced biometric and background check mandates compared to prior policies.
@TeamSteveHilton @SteveHiltonx
oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/fi…
1
4
54
Idk all what he said or didn’t say, all I know is Reddington (and Lindsay) stipulated (agreed) to go with an affirmative defense that she killed her kids but wanted the protection to prove she was not insane at the time (the actual moments) she was killing her kids.
That’s why at least 3x’s in the trial he said “she killed her kids”
17
You along with others saying this are ABSOLUTE MORONS! Defense cannot “bifurcate a trial” when defense is simultaneously trying to argue (1) prove that she did it & (2) prove that when she did it, she was NOT mentally insane at the time she killed the kids. YOU CAN ONLY PICK ONE — if defense picks (1) then she’d plead “not guilty” if defense picks (2) then she pleads an AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE “not guilty by reason of insanity”.
IF THE JUDGE BIFURCATED THE TRIAL THIS WAY -then- IT CREATES A RISK OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY. Why?? because if they had a trial on (1) & the prosecution proved she did do it (ie: guilty) then skipping the ‘punishment phase’ to have another trial on (2) that she “did it because of mental insanity”, risks her (or any defendant) being found “guilty a second time” — WHICH IS LITERALLY BEING TRIED FOR THE SAME CRIME TWICE! Not legal.
🚨Which is why the Judge denies it & why Reddington STIPULATED (agreed) to the fact that she killed her kids
Bifurcating a trial means splitting it into two (or more) separate phases so the jury decides 1 issue at a time instead of everything together.
How cases are typically bifurcated:
• Civil: liability first, then damages.
• Capital: guilt first, then penalty.
• 2 or more Defendants: separating one defendant’s case from another.
Reddington’s main argument in bifurcating the trial was that putting both questions (1) did she kill the kids & (2) her mental state when she murdered the kids, in one trial forced him to present mental-state evidence that would also tend to prove she did the killings, which he said collided with her rights against self incrimination.
Reddington later offered to formally stipulate - meaning he formally agree that fact is true so it does not have to be proven at trial - the fact that she was involved in the deaths, so the only issue at trial would be criminal responsibility.
The judge denied the motion (and later denied reconsideration) for several practical and legal reasons:
• The two questions (did she kill the kids and her mental state when she murdered the kids) overlapped. Evidence of what happened and evidence of her mental state at the time are not cleanly separable.
• Many of the same witnesses and experts would have to testify twice on nearly the same facts.
• Splitting the trial would create fights over which evidence belongs in which phase and would confuse the jury rather than help it.
• There was no other defense besides lack of criminal responsibility, so there was little risk of prejudice from mixing the issues.
• Bifurcation is discretionary and is normally used when it saves time & money (judicial economy). Judge found it would do the opposite.
• A defendant does NOT have a constitutional right to a two-phase trial in this situation.
60
It’s really baffling to hear her not only try to reframe his argument to well that’s not gonna help us right now to completely dismissing the fact that if you build another refinery, then more crude oil can be refined — which increases the supply to match demand.
The fact that she cannot for the life of her seem to understand that when supply is low 📉 & demand is high 📈 prices rise 💲💲💲💲👎🏽
… so when you increase supply 📈 to match or exceed demand 📉prices drop 💲💲👍🏽 IS THE MOST MADDENING THING
2
75
This is gonna be amazing to watch G-paw Gingrich with @elonmusk & @PalmerLuckey
5
262
They were specifically discussing CHILDREN w/ a LIFE THREATENING CONDITION. This changes the game than “free healthcare to illegals”. MANY people come to the U.S. for life saving medical treatment for their children… MORALLY, WE SHOULD SUPPORT MEDICALLY FRAGILE CHILDREN. The child’s parent(s) is a different debate.
The “freak out” in the report that these children “may lose their life, saving medical treatment” *IF* they are “kicked off of Tenn-Care” HAS A LOT OF MOVING PARTS, based on individual circumstances, TO BE CONSIDERED “a risk to the lives of medically ill ‘noncitizen’ children”… and that’s only assuming the report is accurate that the children are noncitizens.
IF the child has a life threatening or server disabling medical condition like heart condition, cancer, sickle cell, down syndrome, cerebral palsy, or spina bifida, THEN the child (depending on child’s lawful status) WILL LIKELY be determined to be “Disabled Child” under SSI Rules & may be eligible for SSI disability benefits until attainment of age 18. **See photo for lawful status’ that qualify noncitizen children as a ‘qualified alien’ for SSI**
TENNESSEE IS A “1634 State” — this means that when a medically fragile child/adult disabled child qualifies & receives at least $1 of SSI, then the State automatically enrolls the child into State Medicaid. — this is a separate determination from parents & does NOT automatically qualify parents who would not meet rules to receive Medicaid/public benefits.
IF the child meets one of the below statuses (citizen or noncitizen), AND the child meets SSI Disability Rules, THEN the child will still receive full Tenn-Care, Tennessee Medicaid.
LAST RESORT — CSS is a TN Dept. of Health program for children under 21 with serious disabilities or life-threatening conditions (ie: cancer, spina bifida, cystic fibrosis, congenital heart disease, etc) when family income is at or below 225% of federal poverty level (FPL), and there is no other coverage. It has historically paid for treatment regardless of immigration status. About 400 immigrant children were on it this year. — CSS is the program the state tried to pull immigrant children off of in June 2026, or else report them to the state’s immigration-enforcement office. A court blocked that. As of the July 14, 2026 agreed temporary injunction, the Health Department must keep those children enrolled, recertify them without using immigration status, and not report them, until trial.
NOTE 🔖 parent’s status does not create coverage for the child, and it does not take away a child’s own eligibility.
ssa.gov/ssi/text-child-ussi.…
2
3
371
I LOVE THIS 🥰 as a parent, I know the feelings you’re experiencing all too well, after my daughter had 5 brain surgeries in 1-year. SENDING PRAYERS 🙏🏽 FOR STRENGTH, HEALING & MORE DANCE PARTIES 🎼💃🏽🎊🎶🎉
2
64
2,588
When someone pleas “not guilty by reason of insanity” they are conceding to the underlying conduct… to killing the person
“by reason of insanity” is what’s called an AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE like someone claiming self defense to a charge of killing someone… in essence you’re saying you did it (killed them) BUT FOR a underlying reason is why you should not be “found guilty” for committing such crime.
So the trial is not about whether the prosecution proving that you killed them, it’s about the prosecution proving/providing enough evidence that you were “not insane” (for insanity defense) or “not defending yourself” (for self-defense claim), and the defense providing enough evidence to create “reasonable doubt” that you “were insane” or “were defending” yourself.
Now, proving that someone was insane is SPECIFIC to the MOMENT THE ACT WAS OCCURRING… while a history of mental illness can create “reasonable doubt” it’s up to the prosecution to cut through with evidence to demonstrate that AT THE TIME OF THE CRIME they were likely NOT insane through the evidence of actions and behavior of the defendant.
FOR INSTANCE — making a reasonably short phone call with no evidence of irrational speech and seemingly clear linear thinking, in between killing 2 or more humans when you’re claiming you’re in a “psychosis state”… or even freaking TF OUT on the phone call because you came out of a psychosis state realizing what you did (meaning you probably wouldn’t proceed killing)
1
1
55
From the French Revolution, to the Boljević Revolution, to Mao’s Cultural Revolution, to the Globalist Color Revolution — From the Frankfurt School, to Gramsci’s Cultural Marxism, to the UK’s Fabian Society, to the German National Socialist, to the Democrat Socialist of America… THEY ALL FEED PROPAGANDA TO THE MASSES. TWISTING LIES INTO FACT & QUESTIONS INTO MOTIVE
They're targeting Trump for reviving the American System of Hamilton, Clay, Lincoln and McKinley.
@BarbaraMBoyd on the 250-year British plot to destroy it, from the French Revolution to Marx to today's DSA:
Her new pamphlet: prometheanaction.com/the-rea…
2
3
6
356
🚨 EXTREME INTELLIGENCE: ok, Hear Me Out. Instead of “Super Intelligence” WE CHANGE IT TO “EXTREME INTELLIGENCE” so we can say “E.I. E.I Uh-oh, what's poppin' tonight?”
… & when the boomers are dooming Should we apologize?… or leave ‘em pissed… “Andele Andele, mami, E.I E.I… Uh-oh”
@elonmusk @jgebbia @VP @SecRubio
2
9
2,440
@jgebbia - WE THE PEOPLE ARE NOT WORTHY! Not only was this an EPIC undertaking, it’s a TOTAL GAME CHANGER across so many levels!
Not only is this going to be useful & vital for advancing election integrity and security, BUT THIS IS GOING TO SINGLE HANDEDLY REDUCE JUSTIFICATION FOR A LARGE FEDERAL WORKFORCE & more importantly LOWERING COST
4
34
901
On the holy Feats Day of the Archangels… PRAISE BE TO GOD for Florida Leadership finding the strength of St. Michael to defend us in battle, St. Gabrielle to send a strong message against those who wish us harm, & St. Raphael to heal our spirits and wounds ✝️ ~ Amen
11
341
AND YET HE ADMITTED SHE DID IN COURT… not 1x, not 2x’s, but 3x’s
1st ⏱️ - in opening argument
2nd ⏱️ - during trial
3rd ⏱️ - in closing statement
Gina Milan
EXCEPT HE SAID SHE DID — “I’m saying she suffered postpartum psychosis WHEN SHE KILLED HER KIDS” ~Reddington
1
1
8
557
WRONG! He’s arguing NOT to have a new trial. Reddington is arguing that it’s somehow “double jeopardy”. A “mistrial” does not determine whether or not the defendant will or will not face “punishment”… Only an ‘Acquittal’ or ‘Guilty’ verdict determines if defendant will be punishment for crime… which is what the double jeopardy clause prevents. A mistrial says neither prosecution or defense has presented evidence for there to be a conclusive verdict — an Acquittal -or- found Guilty
5
519
REDDINGTON SAID SHE DID
… not 1x - in opening statements,
… not 2x’s - in during trial +opening
…BUT 3x’s - opening +trail +closing
➕ also acknowledging it during closing in referencing prosecutions opening
@EdPaltzik @FugitiveTV_Live
EXCEPT HE SAID SHE DID — “I’m saying she suffered postpartum psychosis WHEN SHE KILLED HER KIDS” ~Reddington
3
17
622
VETTING FAILURES “…they’ve ALL been asylum” … “Its apart of the [Democrat] Party Platform”
1
10
28
642
‼️ITS FMAP‼️ FRAUD in One State is a Tax Paid by Every Citizen in every other State & a DOUBLE TAX on the citizens in the State the Fraud is Committed in.
FMAP = Federal Medical Assistance Percentage. It’s the % the Federal Government PAYS to states to administer (run) a number of Federal Public Benefit “welfare” Programs — also known as “Public Means Tested Benefits”,🔖 ** not all public means tested benefits use FMAP**
FMAP is based on the States per capita income - the higher the states per capita income, the lower the Federal Government Pays State THE LOWEST PERCENT IS 50% and the highest percent is 83% ➕% of State Admin Cost… but individual state caps and specific programs can differ, like the ACA Medicaid expansion is at 90%.
📌 ie… $500 million in Medi-Cal Fraud in California (California’s Medicaid program) with California FMAP @ 50% = every tax paying citizen is assuming $250 million of the financial burden + 50% of California’s Medi-Cali’s admin cost
BUT… Not Every Benefit Program is based on FMAP percentage, some, like @USDA SNAP (food stamps) IS PAID AT 100% 💯 by the Fed Gov’t ➕% of State Admin Cost
📌 ie… $500 million in SNAP FRAUD found in CALIFORNIA = every tax paying citizen is assuming ALL $500 MILLION of the financial burden, regardless of the state you’re in — b/c 100% 💯 of SNAP is paid by Federal Gov’t ➕50% of California’s SNAP admin cost
Erin (Air-Ren) Thatcher
🚨Public Benefit ‘Welfare’ Fraud in 1 STATE IS PAID BY EVERY CITIZEN in Every Other State‼️IT’S FMAP‼️
FMAP = Federal Medical Assistance Percentage. It’s the % the Federal Government PAYS to states to administer (run) a number of Public Benefit “welfare” Programs — also known as “Public Means Tested Benefits”,🔖 ** not all public means tested benefits use FMAP**
FMAP is based on the States per capita income - the higher the states per capita income, the lower the Federal Government Pays State
THE LOWEST PERCENT IS 50% and the highest percent is 83% ➕% of State Admin Cost… but individual state caps and specific programs can differ, like the ACA Medicaid expansion is at 90%.
📌 ie… $500 million in Medi-Cal Fraud in California (California’s Medicaid program) with California FMAP @ 50% = every tax paying citizen is assuming $250 million of the financial burden + 50% of California’s Medi-Cali’s admin cost
BUT… Not Every Benefit Program is based on FMAP percentage, some, like @USDA SNAP (food stamps) IS PAID AT 100% 💯 by the Fed Gov’t ➕% of State Admin Cost
📌 ie… $500 million in SNAP FRAUD found in CALIFORNIA = every tax paying citizen is assuming ALL $500 MILLION of the financial burden, regardless of the state you’re in — b/c 100% 💯 of SNAP is paid by Federal Gov’t ➕50% of California’s SNAP admin cost
1
3
120
AMERICA.GOV - your concierge government awaits your questions
Thanks @BretBaier for having me 🇺🇸
Airbnb co-founder leads Trump admin in creating 'concierge' to navigate government foxnews.com/video/6405770809… #FoxNews
81
Add shifting to a SELF SUFFICIENCY MODEL for public welfare benefits & AWAY FROM DEPENDENCY — giving US citizen households on welfare (low income households) a way to incrementally increase earning if & while simultaneously saving for American 1st priorities (Homeownership, Family, & Health) … WHILE ALSO allowing moderate income households an avenue to REDUCE INCOME TAX when saving for same American-1st Priorities.
🚨BETTER IDEA — rather than talking about “shifting welfare to the states” WHICH WILL give Democrats a “Welfare Doomsday” narrative and undermine the progress Republican led states like Florida have made (promise), HOW ABOUT WE TALK ABOUT SHIFTING WELFARE TO A SELF SUFFICIENCY FAMILY-FIRST DREAM MODEL — by utilizing already-in-place tax advantage structures, disregarding assets in Family-1st Tax Advantage Accounts, and lowering taxable income for citizens wanting to save towards their American 1st Dream.
GIVING LOW & MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS A WAY TO SAVE FOR The AMERICAN-1st DREAM: Family Planning, Homeownership & Health
Simultaneously allowing a PATH OFF social welfare dependency for low income & disabled member households so they incrementally Increase Household Income and/or Get Married.
🚨CREATING OPPORTUNITIES THAT IMPROVE THE OUTCOMES for Everyday Americans to reach the AMERICAN DREAM, & Get Off Welfare, I’D BET ON US CITIZENS EVERYDAY, and twice on Sunday’s… DO YOU⁉️
By REINVESTING & REALIGNING a portion of the @WHFraudTF fraud $ ‘FRAUD SAVINGS’ back towards American Citizens by temporarily reallocating a portion of the Fraud Savings ($65 billion yr) towards a WELFARE STEP-DOWN Family-1st COST SAVINGS Realignment.
Reallocating Fraud Savings would NOT INCREASE Federal spending of the Welfare Realignment rollout for the 1st 5-yrs. BY YEAR SIX (6), the Family-1st Welfare Realignment would be (if not NET NEUTRAL), HAVE A $12 - $109 billion ANNUAL FEDERAL SAVINGS, w/ a moderate estimate at $49 billion annually.
@Heritage @Heritage_Action @JDVance @SecScottBessent @POTUS @JTLonsdale @SecKennedy @DrOzCMS @SenRickScott @ByronDonalds @howardlutnick @Eric_Schmitt @DaveMcCormickPA @HouseGOP @USGAO
dropbox.com/scl/fi/7kw0z4m9f…
1
2
496
When a people start believing that laws are moral merely “because they are law”, the people lose both lawfulness and morality.
Same principle applied to the Nazi’s systematically degrading, rounding up, imprisoning, & murdering Jews (or any group based on nationality, religion, or characteristic) — DOES the fact that Nazi’s made that “Legal” make is MORALLY RIGHT?
NO‼️ LEGALIZING IMMORALITY is a slippery slope into totalitarianism
1
8
217
UNITE IN THE ROSARY in OCTOBER 📿The Rosary, the Prayers, & the Mysteries ✝️ Digital Guide to Save
1
4
172
I find the churches that have a large youth population seem to appeal to those interested in exploring the Catholic faith. My youngest daughter, 16 y/o, has brought 5 of her non-Catholic friends this year alone to mass with us - she went to catholic school so she has a more “close friends” who are Catholic.
I find it completely inspiring that she has faith discussions with her peers (14 to 17 years old) where she welcomes to mass with us, and they welcome the opportunity to come
1
1
4
87
It’s like preaching the truth of the Bible while simultaneously disavowing the Old Testament.
It’s antithetical.
6
With the unknown amount of terrorist that crossed the border, unvetted during the 4-yrs of Biden, estimated between 15-20 million, the DEMOCRAT Congressman and ANYONE who is calling for amnesty, is basically fighting to give comfort to the enemy because WE DO NOT KNOW WHO CAME IN.
@MaElviraSalazar @ICEgov @SecMullinDHS @GOP @DHSgov
INTEL DRIVES OPERATIONS. OPERATIONS TAKE DOWN THREATS.
We pushed our people and intelligence experts into the field — where the fight is.
1,100 terrorism plots disrupted before they happened. A 22% increase.
From nation-state actors to lone wolves, from the streets to cyberspace: we find the threat, work with our partners, and stop it cold.
That’s the mission.
-DKP🇺🇸
1
13
35
694
Next time — PASS OUT ALMONDS, and on the off chance no protesters show up they’re great to eat 😅🤣
3
129
California: We will take your 12 year old away if you don’t affirm their transgendered identity, and we will force gender mutilation meds and surgery on them.
Also California: Kids up to 16 need to sit in a booster seat 💺
6
28
330
The SAVE system is already in place HAS BEEN SINCE 1996 uscis.gov/save/benefit-and-l…
and as far as “it doesn’t happen” THAT IS FAKE — Noncitizens, both lawful & illegal, FRAUDULENTLY VOTE more than you wanna believe
CRAZY_BITCH_FROM_THA_SLAPAHOE_TRIBE 𖧶🪓
Federal prosecutors in Texas have indicted seven noncitizens—including six lawful permanent residents (green card holders)—for illegally voting or falsely claiming U.S. citizenship. U.S. Attorney Ryan Raybould, "Federal elections belong to American citizens, period.💪🇺🇲💯
1
19
Steve 🇺🇸
