It’s not always correct to neglect higher order terms. Tweets don't represent my employer. I follow a lot of people I dislike (not you though).

Underappreciated cause of lib-left fighting on here is that the 80th percentile MAGA member is still dumb as a bag of rocks and the modal conversation with them is like dragging your face across cement. Very rare to find a lib as useless to talk to as the average rightoid
7
7
52
5,829
For Hume The Bell Tolls retweeted
A Handy Beginner’s Dictionary of Philosophy: • Agency (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Art (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Consciousness (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Existence (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Identity (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Justice (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Knowledge (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Life (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Meaning (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Philosophy (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Truth (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Person (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Rationality (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Reality (n): unsure; meaning disputed • Self (n): unsure; meaning disputed
7
14
110
1,966
For Hume The Bell Tolls retweeted
What's the best way to solve linear regression? (No, it’s not least squares.) In our new paper, we show that principal component regression (PCR) beats, up to constants, every monotone spectral filter (incl. gradient descent & ridge regression) on every problem instance! (1/8)
11
85
803
102,276
Machines will never achieve consciousness. What even is this debate.
258
31
438
26,654
it's not any more problematic than the fact that fire is a plasma that burns everything it touches, or that gravity is an invisible non-reducible force the pulls everything towards itself consciousness, in the colloquial sense, is an illusion
1
18
I’m not going to engage in an extended discussion, just pointing out the original argument was incorrect.
12
the hard problem of consciousness is only hard if one believes there is a "you" in the body something is having an experience, but it's not "you" the concept of self is an illusion
3
2
308
No, you have misunderstood. The hard problem survives elimination of the self; it is the presence of any experiential character of reality that is problematic
1
20
It's funny whenever some smartass goes "actually we are all atoms and everything is meaningless" to qualified people and learns that this isn't even remotely the academic consensus anymore.
100
169
11,389
409,360
Unless I messed something up (plausible), I don’t think this is true
1
1
157
Oh, you probably meant Phil of mind isn’t especially biased against physicalism, using the responses here as a measure of bias?
1
76
Interesting how much of this discourse has gone from pretending it's about the functioning of neural networks and straight up to theological discussions about the soul
Yes, human brains are biological machines. Is that really controversial in 2026?!
16
12
219
4,676
Not all who reject reductive materialism do so because of a desire for there to be a soul or something. In fact, if you accept some pretty reasonable positions and want to avoid a “magic” step, it’s pretty easy to fall into something that rejects materialism. It does sound
1
32
difficult to believe if you’re not well read on the subject, but sometimes that’s just how things go. Reductive materialism in its least magical form asks you to accept some pretty hard to accept things too, it turns out.
6
Something that gets missed when this comes up is that in the heavily populated parts of the Americas, much of the vulnerability to disease also came from the severe societal disruption experienced. Many of the very damaging plagues were from (probably) endemic diseases
you know how native americans were utterly anhiliated by european diseases they have no immune response to? how come the europeans didnt catch native american diseases in the same way
1
49
I don’t want to overstate the point, novel diseases wreaked havoc and move ahead of actual European expansion oftentimes. Just that the syndemic aspects absolutely should be remembered as well.
14
Not sure these are actually the best nine but I started naming greats until I ran out of space
No. 6 plastic death just should be "the first glass beach album" but for some reason they didn't have that. I actually hate plastic death. Tried to pick one album of every genre. Not necessarily my favorite now, but the one that introduced me to that world
24
No. 6 plastic death just should be "the first glass beach album" but for some reason they didn't have that. I actually hate plastic death. Tried to pick one album of every genre. Not necessarily my favorite now, but the one that introduced me to that world
9
28
2,137
Haven’t heard any of these
2
1
172
Knife Man is a masterpiece
1
26
Replying to @envisionedluna
Plastic death was such a letdown after how good the first glass beach album was
1
1
42
Having to simultaneously read awful reasoning about the death penalty (from both sides) and presence of consciousness (from both sides) is going to be what finally ends me
1
1
40
Consciousness is one of those tricky terms to describe. Its like an emergent byproduct of intelligence. Almost like attempting to observe an observation of itself. But what is the connection between the presence of consciousness and reasoning for the death penalty? I was confused by that
1
9
Oh no, they’re two totally separate things that together are making up 90% of my feed.
1
5
"I think evolution is true and physics is causally closed" The effective altruists are crazy! They think we're related to FISH!
The effective altruists are incapable of being normal, episode 17,476
10
14
402
14,964
Working on a blog post about it but there's a lot to say
1
3
64
Looking forward to it!
1
21
Replying to @peterjhasson
I do not believe current AI models are conscious
3
70
897
Why do you think this?
1
53
Replying to @GhostBoyVT
Let me sidestep this a little. I think many people in these discussions don't have a firm meaning in mind, and a large portion of them really just mean something like "acts in a way sufficiently similar to a human" or "is of moral consequence" (they *mean* that it means that).
1
4
The poorly defined/understood terms by many people is a large part of why it is so frustrating. That said, I think the most *interesting* versions of the question are the presence of subjectivity, the presence of phenomenal experience, and the coherence of those two ideas.
1
6
idk I think the burden of proof (or, if you like, the burden of persuasion) lies with those who think a concatenation of many matrix multiplications produces consciousness
I still have yet to hear a convincing argument that LLMs are *definitely* not conscious.
69
43
807
58,497
Who the hell said it "affects the truth of a claim"? And there is a clear default position: we have no idea what causes consciousness, and any arbitrary claim that [insert mechanism x] causes it is likely false, but the floor is open to show it's really [insert mechanism x].
2
61
2,589
You certainly seem to, otherwise I'm not sure what the point being made is-- you're not engaged in a debate with the guy you're retweeting. What you've described doesn't give you a position on the presence of phenomenal consciousness in LLMs etc.
3
11
599
AI will never have a soul. It will never be conscious. And it can never have rights.
105
184
2,798
41,927
Repeatedly stating the thing you want to be true will do a lot to strengthen your conviction and little to sway people not already emotionally committed to that same position. This is not a good thing!
1
85