xtro.dev Codex and Claude from iPhone retasc.com Linear+Conductor had a baby xenarch.com Stripe alternative with 0% on x402
1AU
- Tweets 7,596
- Following 334
- Followers 1,129
- Likes 1,568
Everyone is shipping “personal AI assistants,” but most people have never had a human personal assistant.
So what the hell are they supposed to ask it to do?
A human assistant teaches you what to delegate. These bots just give you 10 canned examples and wait.
And I think that’s the biggest problem nobody is talking about…
1
3
340
this promo video is so good, i don’t even think its AI
is it AI? anyone from Anthropic can confirm? @AnthropicAI
Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family.
It’s a clear upgrade over Sonnet 5, runs more than 30% faster, and costs up to 30% less for most work.
197
latest models are nuts! do you guys feel the same?
do you miss writing syntax by hand?
Nobody died of sadness they dont need to write syntax anymore, I hope. There is a great future especially for those who wrote code with passion. They just need to let go and embrace the new world, the sooner the better.
142
Anthropic reported ~80% margins on its API business. That makes the reported usage inside $200 subscriptions hard to reconcile.
I suspect those usage numbers are largely inflated, or presented in a way that makes the $200 price feel like a much better deal.
A $200 Claude Code sub gets you ~$9,000 of Opus usage per month.
I have managed to run 3 Claude accounts down to 0% since Opus 5.5 dropped.
When analyzing their usage, costs were $2,086, $2,442, and $2,182.
Average is $2,200/week, so ~$9,000/month
164
I’ve been seeing these Opus 5.5 videos lately.
They’re really impressive, especially this one
credits to @anabology
Problem: when everyone uses the same format, the novelty dies fast. There are thousand videos posted in the last few days.
We call this: Format fatigue.
142
Thanks to everyone for interacting and for the discussion in the comments of this post that blew up yesterday.
Still surprised some devs didn’t understand DHH’s message, because it was crystal clear:
Writing code by hand no longer makes economic sense. We now have tools that write code far faster than humans. Let’s get over the nostalgia, use them, and ship awesome products.
It’s a brave new world!
DHH is probably one of the top software artisans of the past decade. Hearing him speak with this much conviction and transparency about one of the most polarizing topics in software right now, writing code by hand vs. with AI, is something pretty much every software engineer should hear a few times.
Especially those still on the wrong side of history.
1
1
223
DHH is probably one of the top software artisans of the past decade. Hearing him speak with this much conviction and transparency about one of the most polarizing topics in software right now, writing code by hand vs. with AI, is something pretty much every software engineer should hear a few times.
Especially those still on the wrong side of history.
204
405
4,172
1,260,922
i agree with maybe half of the findings, but i did’d like that it was actually a promo in semi-disguise, @atmoio not because promoting is wrong, but it felt like a conflict of interest. I love your videos bro, but this one felt a bit weird. Just a wrong format.
I’ve spoken to over 50 people 1:1 over the last several months to better understand how they code with AI.
It’s an absolute mess.
Here are the top 8 mistakes I see.
0:00 - Intro
1:19 - Mistake 1: Talking to 2026 models like they’re 2025 models
2:43 - Mistake 2: Devising funky metaphorical factories to orchestrate your agents
3:59 - Mistake 3: Treating context as sacred
6:02 - Mistake 4: Treating previous conversations as sacred
7:59 - Mistake 5: Having a todo list
10:00 - Mistake 6: Using funky tools
13:47 - Mistake 7: Stressing over code quality
24:27 - Mistake 8: Using branches and worktrees
2
323