Pretty sure there are more dots than bots already in this little world. Cool thing is that we鈥檙e improving them everyday and they learn directly from your feedback.
609
65
3,714
407,069
Nah, the browser even reset and lose all cookies, dot is rather stupid and had too much limitation, even when I ask him to make a pet, he refuse to make an animation for sonic spin dash debrish 馃槓
1
862
i've started hating this reset bullshit so fucking much. - so i have a reset coming on Sunday anyway, with about 30% left. - they announce that the reset will happen on Friday @ 10 am. - ok, i don't want to lose my 30%, so i spin up Astra and use it for some big refactoring work i was planning to do over the weekend. - there's no reset @ 10 am because their compute power probably can't handle it right now, so they just go completely silent.
Global reset landing tomorrow 10am PST for all paid ChatGPT accounts. Apologies for the slow start with GPT-6.1 Sol, it's now back to running at expected speeds after the massive load spike in the first two days.
141
33
2,177
221,788
It has been reset now, no? It just got delayed a few hour, not cancelled?
327
Hi! What would you like to see us ship for dots and space in the next two weeks? Or how can we improve things in other parts of the product.
5,506
103
4,505
899,629
Whatsapp and yahoo plugin? 馃ぃ
5
Warga yang kerja di BI, info dong 馃槶 Uang lama kayak gini masih bisa ditukar nggak sih? Sayang banget, abis beberes lemari malah nemu segepok uang jadul 馃ス馃ス Para kolektor uang, merapat dong. Ada yang tahu info soal ini? 馃憖
796
604
16,419
3,986,926
eh kok cakep bgt dah warnanya馃槶 ini tahun berapa ya ?
5
35
135,029
GPT-6.1 Sol feels unlimited, because it runs at 20 tokens per second 馃槀 Scam Altman strikes again!
144
106
2,996
169,262
Well, I honestly support slow mode, people requesting such feature before 馃ぃ
75
馃毃 Codex users - how鈥檚 the burn rate with GPT-6.1 Sol after the recent reset? Better? Worse? Or exactly the same? 馃憖
64
42
21,064
It didn't burn as much, but ain't as smart as astra either
187
loker seram馃槆
1,105
703
11,962
1,223,786
Prinsip hidup gw cuma satu, klo lo gabisa gaji org dengan normal, gausah rekrut pegawai, kerja sndiri aja, dan klo emg dirasaa kerja sndiri secape itu, ya brti harus sadar diri karyawan juga capee ya gaji dengan normal, taukan ada umk.
10
218
4,642
157,292
Baca lagi aturannya, UMK itu dikecualikan untuk usaha mikro/kecil, jadi kalo omsetnya masih kurang dari 15 milyar/tahun, gak wajib UMK
6
2
4,507
Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo
7,186
1,618
21,853
17,037,987
Tibo, same $200, half the API-equivalent allowance. What evidence shows subscribers will get more done on their actual workloads, including failed runs and retries? If my output drops, what does that guarantee get me, and over what timeframe?
1
11
2,225
It seems applied only to sol 6, not astra
1
1
78
Waktunya ngebut lg nih, devday tgl 29 kayaknya bakal ada reset lg 馃榿
Replying to @giadotai
Sorry Gia. More resets coming next week
37
Resets all propagated. That will be all. Have a fantastic weekend.
2,133
473
16,199
2,565,898
@thsottiaux This reset actually put me in a worse position. I still had 45% of my weekly usage left, and my normal reset was only around 3 days away. So in reality, I had 45% left now, plus another 100% coming in 3 days. That鈥檚 basically 145% of a weekly allowance available to me over the next few days. But after this reset, I鈥檓 back at 100% and my next weekly reset has been pushed all the way to 7 days from now. So instead of helping, this actually reduced what I would have had available from 145% to 100%. I basically lost that remaining 45%, even though this was supposed to be a compensation/reset. It would have been much fairer to reset the usage without changing the original weekly reset date, or just add the extra usage separately. Please look into this for people whose reset dates got pushed back.
85
18
1,314
108,127
You type too much, stop typing and burn more token for next reset, hopefully on devday 2 day later
241
Hey @grok remove the worst world leader..
343
85
4,106
7,053,350
Trump for sure
4,569
Did you guys already receive the Codex limits reset? Also not sure when it鈥檒l drop
110
2
319
66,843
I bet it was around 15.00 WIB or 00.00 PST?
557
馃毃 Honestly curious: Is anyone really interested in getting the $500 Codex plan? 馃憖
71
29
12,261
Let's play the game called "Guess the offered usage for $500 plan" I'll start! My bet is x100. What's yours?
83
1
91
20,731
50x for $500 is similar to 20x for $200, I think they tried to filter the pro 20x user? $200 for 20x is affordable for a lot of people, so they change the tier to filter people from buying $500 for smaller people 馃槅
188
Replying to @xdiandrasavitri
Guru SD Kelas rendah loh itu, yg di urus anak2, kecuali kelas tinggi yg anak2 udah mayan gede oke lah. Kalau bukan guru gak usah main judge dari sosmed doang.
1
12
22,134
Jaman sekarang predator dimana mana, jangankan anak SD, anak TK/balita pun ada yang ngembat
615
Would you use GPT-6 Sol over Astra now?
114
72
30,954
No, 6 sol is dumber
3
666
GPT-6 Sol and Luna benchmarks are out. These are the worst benchmarks in OpenAI history. They鈥檙e basically impossible to read. If anyone can make sense of them, let me know.
91
8
243
61,031
Yo wtf they made already cheap Luna even cheaper. It鈥檚 now 30%-40% the price of 5.6 Luna and on xhigh its performance is on par with Sol and opus? Am I taking crazy pills? You鈥檙e right though the charts are difficult to read
3
1
1,258
But the sharp drop in score is concerning honestly 馃
20
Kalo sudah begini salah siapa coba
254
136
575
124,008
Ini mah kayaknya emang sengaja ngundang 2 alam yg beda barengan si 馃ぃ
25
jujur aja ges
1,095
195
941
103,395
Regression dg memori intact? 馃ぃ
16
Ladies and gentlemen... start... your... ENGINES. We are almost Tuesday and I promised a reset for Tuesday. Among some other things. See you soon.
5,539
1,357
28,014
5,851,407
Eeeeh, didn't you say it was suppose to be a banked reset instead? 馃ゲ
261