IMO it’s very smart to partner with CMU rather than attempt to start Griffin University.
University prestige is one of the longest-duration network effects in the economy… CMU itself is the newest university in the top 50 in the US, from 1900!
A degree is valuable in large part because everyone agrees it’s valuable. Students want Harvard because employers and grad schools value Harvard. Employers value Harvard partly because great students go there. Great students go because great faculty, alumni and other great students are there. Successful alumni donate, the school gets richer and more selective, and the cycle compounds.
It’s a coordination equilibrium that becomes incredibly hard for a new entrant to break.
You can spend billions and buy a beautiful campus, labs, great professors and scholarships, but you can’t buy generations of alumni, employer recognition, applicant demand and the shared belief that a degree from your institution means something.
Stanford is the most recent ultra elite university, founded in 1885. It was absurdly well capitalized and benefitted from the West Coast being a huge underserved market.
Essentially no new entrant has broken into the top tier of American universities, despite some good attempts (Olin, Minerva, UATX)
Imo the new Horowitz Andreessen Academy is a very interesting experiment. They’re explicitly trying to build an elite institution from scratch for young builders. The first class will be tuition-free and have access to people like Jensen, Sama, Satya, and Patrick Collison, plus employer partnerships with a bunch of top companies.
It’s polarizing, but putting Horowitz and Andreessen in the name is very smart imo.
The fundamental problem with starting a university is that a new institution has no reputation, but they get to borrow a reputation from day one… Andreessen and Horowitz already mean something in the exact network they’re targeting. The name signals something to ambitious young builders, founders, investors and tech employers, they are borrowing prestige from them and the people that students will have access to.
They’re effectively trying to bootstrap the network effect instead of waiting 100 years for it to emerge.
Which gets back to Griffin. With $2B, he could build Griffin University. Instead he’s essentially building a new university in Miami and putting CMU’s name on it.
Ken can buy almost everything a university needs except the hardest asset to create: the accumulated belief in the name, and CMU has a good one!
So why is it that today donors create all these satellite campuses of existing schools (CMU Miami, Cornell Tech, NYU Dubai) instead of new universities? Carnegie and Mellon didn't create Harvard Pittsburgh, why is this not Griffin University?